Join 80,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover

Oncologists Are the Worst People to Treat Cancer

Published on September 28, 2012

Description: Chemotherapy_doctor.JPG

Radiation therapy and chemotherapy are highly toxic treatments aimed at killing cancer cells. The problem is these therapies create cancer stem cells and that means instead of treating cancer, they are causing cancer. This is a long story that is going to have a short ending because the gig is up for orthodox oncology. They have reached the point of no return and should all retire before they are thrown in jail for deliberately provoking more cancer in their patients.

Fox News and many others have published the news about this undesirable effect of helping to create cancer stem cells—cells researchers say are particularly adept at generating new tumors and are especially resistant to treatment. The medical media is saying that this might help explain why late-stage cancers are often resistant to both radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

We know that cancer stem cells give rise to new tumors. These stem cells are ultimately responsible for the recurrence of cancer or the dangerous spreading of it throughout the body. Scientists also have found that cancer stem cells are more likely than other cancer cells to survive chemotherapies and radiation therapies, probably because their “stemness” allows them to self-replenish by repairing their damaged DNA and removing toxins.

“Radiotherapy has been a standard treatment for cancer for so long, so we were quite surprised that it could induce stemness,” said study researcher Dr. Chiang Li, of Harvard Medical School in Boston. An amazing statement considering these doctors have all along been playing around with super-toxic chemotherapy poisons and radioactive death-inducing rays—and now they are surprised that this is the mechanism of death?

Oncologists & Stress

The CDC says that, “Intensive and prolonged stress can lead to a variety of short- and long-term negative health effects. It can disrupt early brain development and compromise functioning of the nervous and immune systems. In addition, childhood stress can lead to health problems later in life including alcoholism, depression, eating disorders, heart disease, cancer, and other chronic diseases.”

Oncologists do not help people with their stress—they are trained to increase it! Most cancer patients, feeling burdened by poor self-images, unresolved conflict and worries, or past emotional conflict/trauma that still lingers in the subconscious mind and cellular memories, are extremely vulnerable to domineering oncologists who think they know all about cancer and how to treat it.

Learn to diagnose yourself so you can treat yourself and your loved ones! Learn More

Cancer usually occurs when there is a strong undercurrent of emotional uneasiness and deep-seated frustration. It helps tremendously to confront and address these issues but that is not at all what present-day oncology is about. Orthodox oncologists will only cause more trauma, conflict and worry, and that will not help people recover from cancer.

The Best-Trained Doctors

The best-trained doctors in the country, from schools like Harvard Medical or any other, are ill-trained to deal with today’s medical realities. They are, in fact, hopelessly lost without their pharmaceutical medicines, each of which delivers a toxic wallop to the body.

They were trained to be chemical witchdoctors and to “practice medicine” solely based on prescribing harmful drugs that ultimately undermine one’s health. They were totally brainwashed in medical school and throughout their internships and residencies at hospitals and they remain oblivious to the harm they cause. Some say we should have compassion for them because they have no choice but to “toe the line” if they want to keep their jobs.

Doctors are not going to like it one bit when people start understanding how obsolete they are. If they are humble and have the courage to change and start practicing a new form of medicine, they can continue to serve their patients and their oaths to not hurt people.

Every direction we turn in medicine we see the same tale. Breast cancer survivors of chemotherapy, for example, are facing increased risk of heart disease—so much so that at least some doctors are debating if it’s time to abandon chemotherapy as a mainstay in breast cancer treatment. Drugs called anthracyclines are a breast chemo staple despite the well-known risks: They weaken women’s hearts. “In the process of curing their breast cancer, we’ve exposed them to some pretty nasty things. And it’s not just one nasty thing, it’s a sequence of nasty things,” explains Dr. Pamela Douglas, a Duke University cardiologist.

Nasty is the perfect word for oncologists and what they do. They were trained to be nasty right down to their genes so even though they might be physically healthy, they have cancer of the heart and conscience as they have no empathy or compassion for anything other than their own nasty medical view. They are insecure and that is why they have needed to have the law on their side. In the UK people are bound legally by The Cancer Act of 1939, which says that we can’t make any claims about cancer treatment outside of the normal allopathic approach. That smacks and smells like a terrorist act to me.

It’s normally the job of the physician to explain to patients what they need and what will happen if they follow their recommendations and what will happen if they don’t. They lie to themselves about the alternatives so they really do not know or understand any other kind of treatment but their own. It’s almost impossible to find doctors who are not heavily biased and today’s cancer industry is a battlefield between alternative methods and failed mainstream oncology.

Ask an oncologist this most important question: What sense is there in saving my life if you are going to also destroy it? Beware and take care, for once you open the door and walk down the orthodox oncology aisle, there is no getting away from treatments without being treated as a criminal. God forbid you try to take your kids out of their reach for they will call social services and have you separated from your kids by the SWAT team. Oncologists’ attitudes will normally seem polite until you try to question or challenge their treatment protocols and then they think nothing of legally stripping you of your rights.

Studies show that as many as two-thirds of cancer patients who use unproven remedies do not tell their doctors, knowing the bitter conflict and scathing medical disapproval they will receive.

“They almost always wear suits and ties, sport enough degrees after their names to choke an elephant and speak in serious and seemingly knowledgeable tones about science and health. And they can kill you just as dead as any trigger-happy terrorist hefting an AK-47,” writes attorney Scott C. Tips. Instead of being honest and open, many oncologists are impossible to communicate with and this arrogance makes it very difficult to think straight and decide on reasonable treatment.

Sadly, we are the most conditioned, programmed beings the world has ever known and we believe just about anything fed to us through the media, especially in the area of medicine. There are people who know this and pray upon our vulnerabilities. Our thoughts and attitudes have been shaped through many years of continuous propaganda, molded by people who do not care for anything but money and power and their own stupid ideas about medicine.

The public’s perceptions of health and medicine have been implanted in the public consciousness by thousands of media clips every year. But obviously if one pays attention one can see in these same media clips (seen above) that orthodox oncology—with both its dangerous diagnostics and treatment strategies—is a really bad idea. Since the first bible was printed on the first press special interests (the rich) have had their distorting fingers in almost everything of import printed and the race of man continues to remain ignorant of this.

Once again I say that I reserve especially potent venom for the oncologists and what they do on behalf of their pharmaceutical overlords. Fortunately the sun is setting on their arrogance and we can be thankful that they will not be in humanity’s future unless they seriously change their tune.

Perhaps I should hold out some hope that there are good oncologists who will cling to the truth about what they are and are not doing, like God’s prophet did while trying to find ten good souls in the twin cities of evil of old, but he could not even find one. Before modern orthodox oncology bites the dust it would be reassuring for at least one oncologist to break ranks and look at the truth.

Two hundred billion dollars has been spent on losing the war on cancer. That’s the score! But there is a cure for cancer though it does not grow out of single medicinals or pharmaceuticals—it comes from following a well-thought-out protocol that takes every aspect of cancer and its multiple causes into account.

Doctors rarely talk about "curing" cancer. Instead, the success of treatment is judged on whether a patient is alive five, 10 and 15 years after diagnosis. It is amazing, after all the slash, burning and cutting that oncologists do that survival rates are actually up a little. For instance at the turn of the decade the statistics for England and Wales show that the five-year survival rate for all cancers in men is 31 per cent, while for women the survival rate is 43 per cent. The figures are similar for Scotland. Today though still dismal, they are somewhat better.

# # # #

Learn how to treat yourself and your loved ones safely at home With powerful medicinals

Learn Dr Sircus protocol including dosages, methods, side effects and contra-indications. This bundle includes the Sodium Bicarbonate and Natural Oncology eBooks.

get yours

Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P)

Director International Medical Veritas Association
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine

Join 80,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover


For questions pertaining to your own personal health issues or for specific dosing of Dr. Sircus's protocol items please seek a consultation or visit our knowledge base to see if your question may have been answered previously.
  • Secto666

    Very informing and delightful to read. I myself have always felt the same, but have never expressed it. It is a difficult situation to decide whether; entrusting in a lab coat or educating and researching yourself, is the right decision with death knocking on any door.
    It’s weird how a substance so vile, chemotherapy, has caused so many deaths and at the same time saved/prolonged so many. That sort of relates on how a large amount of people consume the same large amount of crap, and the whole group of people don’t develop cancer the same, in spite of that.

    • Hmmm. I going to have to disagree with you there. Chemotherapy has never saved a life. If the “patient” survives, they do so IN SPITE of the chemo, not because of it.

      We have been taught to be afraid of the symptoms of our own bodies. But why should healing be pain free given the poisons we put in our bodies and the gross self-indulgence and gluttony? Should we abuse and neglect ourselves and then expect an easy return to health? A wise man once said “we work hard to damage our health, we must work equally as hard to restore it”. At the root of the problem is that we don’t want to do this. We don’t want to give up the sweets, the sugar, the fast food, the biscuits and heavy breakfasts. We don’t want to fast. We want an easy solution – so we go to the doctor and he prescribes a synthetic “medication” that masks the symptoms that make our condition worse and worse until we are cured to death.

  • Katherine

    Okay chemotherapy saved my brother so it’s not completely useless.

    • Dani Gray

      When cancer patients undergo chemo “therapy” they are given a baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) drip. This is to stop the chemo “therapy” from wiping out your kidneys.

      Also, there are a number of cancer patients who die 10-15 years AFTER the chemo because it always causes secondary issues as do all synthetic, man made drugs – because they treat the SYMPTOM and NOT the underlying cause.
      In women with breast cancer it often causes heart disease, etc. Also, you are basing your conclusion on just one situation. Just because your brother didn’t die doesn’t mean that chemo saved him. It just means that it didn’t kill him.

      To date, I know of 9 people who had cancer. All except one has had chemo. The youngest ages are twenty something and 42. The oldest 87. The others were between 50 and 65. Each ate the standard American diet, high in processed sugar, processed drinks and foods. Four of these are related to me, three were colleagues, one was a friend and the other was a friends mother-in-law. With the exception of one, all are female. There were five cases of breast cancer, 1 case of pancreatic cancer, 1 case of colon cancer and 1 case of brain cancer. The oldest had a masectomy and chemo and developed another cancer. I do not know what kind of cancer one of my colleagues had.

      Of these nine, eight had chemo “therapy”. Only two are living. Of the two living, one has had a masectomy the other a craniotomy. The former is over 55, the latter is twenty something. The former was in stage 1, had a lumpotomy as well as chemo – the latter is in stage 3 and had no chemo and is considering other methods of true medicine, NOT alternative medicine. The oncologists call day and night. They contacted me because I am the emergency contact. When I asked what the emergency was, I was told that the patient had an appointment and blah, blah, blah. When I informed them that having an appointment was not an emergency, the caller replied “It is for us”.

      Given that a single chemo “therapy” session costs approximately $350,000 I can see how they would come to this conclusion. But I told them to stop calling me anyway. When this tactic failed they offered the patient a chemo “pill”. Probably less expensive than the former but not by much, I’m sure. This was refused also. Then they had a 17 year old contact the patient by phone to discuss their own treatment “treatment”. The young lady prayed, cried and encouraged her to have the chemo. This was, in my estimation, a dirty trick and I wouldn’t be surprised if it was all an act.

      I do not have cancer but I have had my fair share of experiences with “doctor’s”. None of them good. In each instance, I was given a prescription that addressed my symptoms or I was not properly diagnosed so that they could perform further “tests” to “see” what it “could” be.

      The medical industry is a business. And like all businesses the bottom line is money. Your health does not even come into the equation. As long as you are unhealthy, it makes money -billions of dollars each year for the pharmaceutical companies that copy natural remedies so they can put a patent on them and make a profit (similar the food industry and gmo “foods”) doctors and hospitals. Cancer is the goose that lays the golden egg. There are people who have undergone chemo and survived but there are many, many more who die and still more who later in life develop other diseases as a result of having their immune system compromised by chemo, radiation and surgery. I say this to say that one should do a bit of research before basing conclusions on an isolated case.

  • Brunosten

    I just want to say that this man is totally right in what he says. Sorry my poor english, but I`ll try to explain. Two and a half years ago my brother and two other friends of me got cancer, today they are all passed away. The oncologists and the nurses told us “we have to stay positive, we have two believe, even if malign brain cancer never can be cured. These wonderful people died around their 30`s. Oncologism will never cure cancer, that`s for sure. I met a woman who`s the only one surviving gliablastoma in Norway, she didn`t use radiation and she stopped using chemotherapy. She started an organisation for people with brain cancers, but the organisation was banned, the oncologists said she`s a cheater. Who`s the cheater, dear oncologists? You threatment killed my brother and two other friends, they only became 30 years of age. I don`t know why you keep lying about the prognosis, when you know the patient will die. For me some oncologists aren`t human, they are machines without feelings and empathy. One day it`ll be for a day how you`ve threathed the cancer-patient, and from this day the people will hate you for what you`ve done to the one we loved so much.

  • David Lewis

    Ok you seem to have mostly addressed this in a well thought-out calm matter but it seems you’ve forgotten some very important points:
    1. Cancer and heart disease are the leading causes of death in developed countries. If you don’t die from one there’s a very good chance you’ll die from the other. Thus logically it should follow that heart disease would be more prevalent in cancer survivors. Also, why does it matter if it weakens women’s hearts in the long run if they won’t be around then without treatment in the present.
    2. Cancer treatment is FAR less dangerous than cancer itself. The claim that cancer treatment causes cancer seems to imply a little much. Rarely cancer treatment can cause additional cancerous cells, but bear in mind this is not the intended outcome or the common one.
    3. Furthermore, what evidence do you have that oncologists are trained to increase stress? And even if they do to what end? If they are trying to cause cancer again and again wouldn’t they act caring toward individuals with this disease? If only to make them more likely to come and get more treatment.
    4.Also you claim that survival rates are dismal, but you did not include survival rates of those who did not seek treatment or sought alternative treatment.
    5. What is this cure for cancer and why hasn’t it mainstreamed yet?
    6. If doctors are prolonging your life how are they destroying it? Is being bald until you get off treatment worth losing a few years of your life?
    7. Of course doctors would want the law on their side. They do procedures, which, while effective, can be risky. It is not rare for a doctor to be sued. Furthermore doctors are required to list all risks possible side effects, success rates, and alternative methods when informing a patient. They also need written consent to treat a patient with the patient being informed of the afore listed things as well as many others.
    8. If tens of thousands of doctors are on board this conspiracy or were all “brainwashed” why has not one testified of being brainwashed or quit because they couldn’t work without their morals being compromised.(Doctors are human beings too) And since none have how did you learn about this conspiracy?

    While it seems your science and/or logic seems a little off I appreciate that you mostly wrote this article in a calm and informative tone instead of just ranting about how doctors are all idiots for the entire article.

  • Will

    Next time you’re asked for a donation by a cancer charity at the doors to a supermarket tell them that money is not everything in the world and you’ll offer a donation when you’ve finished shopping. Come out of the store and hand them a tub of Sodium Bicarbonate. It may be cheap at just 52p but its value could be priceless and life saving.
    Now why is sarcasm the lowest form of wit when it helps convey a subtle message?

  • Star

    Just the idea of oncology is pure evil. The ” system ” is not healing or curing people and has not been for a long time. It is in fact designed to bring about more suffering and almost certain death. Doctors became a priest class that answers to the dark drug companies. Pharma produce things that do not work. The whole thing is based on mind control and having the masses not take responsibility for themselves. People are indoctrinated from an early age to hand over all power to think for themselves to a lying and totally criminal and psychotic system, that pretends to be otherwise. Its about profit from suffering and gross lies. Why do these idiots get paid so much? IN another time they would all be rounded up and shot, starting with the masterminds.
    The whole system is an over paid lie. Why does something that does not work cost so much, and why do people keep swallowing the lie?? We live in an age of mass stupidity where most people have forgotten how to think critically and where everything is surrendered to an outside authority that has been elevated to the level of a very false god. Its the emporers new clothes on a massive scale.

  • Gilgamesh

    Maybe all people who paid money to these oncologists, should get their money back.
    And the public who donated billions of dollars for cancer research should demand, that
    their donated money be refunded.
    If this is all a big scam, the scammers in the big drug corporations and in the FDA and cancer organizations should be all put in prison for life.
    There maybe many cures for cancer in the last 80 years. Why were they all suppressed?
    I see on CNN almost every week now, that they had a big important breakthrough in cancer research. It just say; They need more money, and maybe in 5-10 years they will have a cure?