Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover

No Danger No Concern No Sanity

Published on March 19, 2011


On March 15 Michi Okugawa wrote, “The situation in Tokyo is getting worse. The number of people who are panicking is increasing with more and more people trying to get out of Tokyo or out of the country. The nuclear plant explosion is having a large effect in our daily lives. The biggest problem is transportation. Tokyo is darker now due to power saving. As I am writing this, more people have decided to evacuate from Tokyo. I am living my usual life but the surrounding is in a panic.”

The government of the world’s third-biggest economy has been insisting that there is no widespread threat of radiation but confirmed that fresh foodstuffs are now showing signs of contamination.

The double speak has officially started so now we know that the trouble is real, dangerously dark and that we will be treated like cows instead of intelligent human beings. On March 19, 2011 it’s been only three short days we have gone to the brink of an unimaginable catastrophe that does not seem so bad if you read the mainstream press. Only light radioactive showers predicted for the weekend over southern California. Nothing to worry about!

The Japanese government said Saturday the 19th radioactive iodine turned has already turned up in tap water in Tokyo and five other areas. Of course they add in the double speak saying that it’s only “small but safe amounts of” of some very dangerous stuff.

Best way of conceptualizing this event: The largest nuclear complex in the world is now in the process of becoming the hottest radioactive emitter in the world with deadly plutonium in the mix. Very soon the showers will turn heavy and no one is going to want to be in the jet streams path. Already they are starting to measure the exposure to the people local to the disaster in terms of how many CAT scans of radiation they are being exposed to as if these medical scans were safe, which they are not.

Nuclear power plants are really dangerous facilities put  in practical use on stipulation that they can “completely seal  in radiation,” while radioactive weapons commit an impermissible  crime scattering radioactive materials in the environment. – Professor Katsuma Yagasaki

Learn to diagnose yourself so you can treat yourself and your loved ones! Learn More

At the power plant site itself, with almost all the reactors and spent fuel ponds in various stages of meltdown we have a super lethal situation that can only get worse. Representative Michael Burgess, Republican of Texas, asked for detail about the radiation levels at the Japanese nuclear plant. “Are we talking about radiation equivalent to a chest X-ray? A CAT scan?” he asked. Gregory B. Jaczko, the chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission replied, “Levels that would be lethal with a fairly short period of time.”

Harold Denton, a former senior official with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission was faced with the Three Mile Island crisis, holding daily news conferences. Talking about the situation in Japan he said, “This is certainly far worse than Three Mile Island.” But the Japanese are not rating it that seriously yet but we each passing day they will see and be forced to admit the more than partial destruction of the northern part of their nation, which in all likelihood include the Tokyo metropolitan area of 30 million people.

There are brave men fighting what could end up being a losing battle against a nuclear Armageddon for Japan and even other large parts of the northern hemisphere. These men will certainly all die so up close they need to be to shoot their water cannon from fire and police trucks.

Some of that lethal stuff is already falling down in “safe” dosages in California and everyone there is being told to not sweat about it—it’s perfectly safe. And even though it can be measured on instruments they want you to believe that your cells will not pick up on the radioactive particles. A diplomat who has access to radiation tracking by the U.N.’s Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization told the Associated Press in Vienna that initial readings show radiation has in fact reached California.

But a little is good for you so really don’t worry about a thing. You better believe I am deadly serious that some people will fight for the devil, for the death principle, which is what radiation is. I have seen doctors fight for the right to use deadly mercury in vaccines and most dentists have not completely given up on mercury laden dental amalgam. Almost everyone in medicine and dentistry thinks fluoride is wonderful for the children. Once there were some psychologists who actually went so far as to publish their new philosophy that child sexual abuse really was not such a bad thing after all. No sanity is the watchword here – but yes I agree. Radiation is healthy, going out in the sun, without toxic sunscreen exposes one to healthy radiation that provides the most wonderful biochemical life-giving effects. But we are going to be talking about really nasty radiation coming from Japan and let’s see what the dosages and exposures are in the end.

In principle, using the Atomic Energy Control Board’s (AECB) regulatory limits, we can calculate that 0.1 micrograms of plutonium can overdose one person while noting that maximum safe exposure limits is placed at 0.56 micrograms maximum full body exposure and 0.25 micrograms for lung exposure. “Experiments with beagle dogs suggest that about 27 millionths of a gram of insoluble plutonium would be sufficient to cause lung cancer in an adult human being with virtual certainty, with significant risks probably associated with far lower doses,” report International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. According to the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR) 0.1 grams would overdose one million people, one gram, ten million people, 100 grams, one billion people and 600 grams, six billion people.


“A rapid release of one kilogram of plutonium at ground level in dispersible, inhalable form would cause a public health emergency of the first magnitude. Plutonium air concentrations could be on the order of hundreds of micrograms per cubic meter of air at one kilometer from the release site. Individuals breathing this air would inhale enough plutonium to cause cancer with certainty within minutes,” said Dr. Edwin S. Lyman of the Nuclear Control Institute. This is the nightmare of nightmares. There is an incredible amount of plutonium in this plant that could very well put us all in supercritical danger.

350 tons of uranium is equal to about a kilogram of plutonium.                                            Dr. Chris Busby

The Pentagon has misled the world with claims that its DU is safe. They have lied about depleted uranium regardless of how many of their own soldiers become ill and die from it and from the toxic vaccines they administer in mega doses before troops are deployed into war theaters. The Pentagon has maintained that DU shells are safe because they contain only mildly radioactive uranium when in reality depleted uranium also contains small amounts of plutonium and other highly radioactive elements. Despite the authorities’ attempts at concealment, the truth is out.

Since World War II, accumulated radiation has increased the radiation burden to the global community. Nuclear weapons testing, nuclear power plants, radiation accidents like Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, and terrible nuclear accidents from earlier years in Russia have all contributed to increasing the overall radiation contamination of the global environment. We cannot escape exposure because we breathe the air, drink the water and eat the food from contaminated soils.

When uranium burns into particles, it will enter human bodies  ingested with drinking water and food, or inhaled with air. In this case,  the whole radiation and chemical toxicity will be released in the body. – Professor Katsuma Yagasaki


According to Dr. Katsuma Yagasaki, “DU dust-like particles can enter human bodies, and once taken into the body, they will become tens of millions times more hazardous. Newly released data indicate that low-level radiation is more likely to cause biochemical abnormalities than intensive high-level radiation. It is wrong to make light of the hazard of low-level radiation.”

After the “Shock and Awe” campaign in Iraq in 2003, very fine particles of depleted uranium were captured with larger sand and dust particles in filters in Britain. These particles had traveled in 7-9 days from Iraqi battlefields as far as 2400 miles away. The radiation measured in the atmosphere quadrupled within a few weeks after the beginning of the 2003 campaign, and at one of the five monitoring locations, the levels required two official alerts to the British Environment Agency.

Within nine days of the start of the Iraq war on March 19, 2003, higher levels of uranium were picked up on five sites in Berkshire. – London Times

The Ministry of Defense refused to acknowledge the possibility of any connection between the use of atomic weaponry in Iraq and these readings in England, saying the uranium was of a “natural origin” and there was no evidence that depleted uranium had reached Britain from Iraq.


According to Dr. Chris Busby and Dr. Saoirse Morgan, who forced the British government to release the above information, “On the basis of the mean increase in uranium in air of about 500nBq/m3 we use respiration data to calculate that each person in the area inhaled some 23 million uranium particles of diameter 0.25 microns. As far as we know, this is the first evidence that uranium aerosols from battle use have been shown to travel so far.” The military, essential partners in everything nuclear, have been playing with the nuclear fires on the battlefields and the stuff is getting back home. Typical they would not tell us commoners anything about it. Will they tell us when things get completely out of control in Japan?

The shattering truth of all this leads us to the conclusion that radiation travels with ease on the winds and the jet stream long, very long distances, so it’s a big mistake to assume we’re out of harm’s way. Busby and Morgan made it perfectly clear that “the evidence from the present analysis is implicit in the results; i.e., the increases found clearly demonstrate that the uranium particles are capable of long-distance travel.”

Busby and Morgan continue saying, “Despite many pieces of evidence that the uranium aerosols are long-lived in the environment and are able to travel considerable distances, this is the first evidence as far as we know, that they are able to travel thousands of miles. The distance traveled from Baghdad to Reading following the wind patterns implicit in the pressure systems at the time is about 2,500 miles. Although this transport may be hard to believe at first, the regular desert sand events that occur in the UK should teach us that the planet is not such a large place, and that with regard to certain long-lived atmospheric pollutants, no man is an island.”

After traveling 2,500 miles, if the exposure to the English was 23 million uranium particles, it is anyone’s guess the amount of fallout that reached the United States. Odds are that everyone in  the northern hemisphere was contaminated to one degree or another.

Special Note on Iodine: Dr. Miller says, “Radioisotopes pose an important health risk to man in nuclear accidents associated with electric power generation due to their uptake by the thyroid glands. Topical application of tincture of iodine (I) was found to be effective in blocking the thyroid uptake of orally administered 131I [131-Iodine] in humans. Abdominal skin application of tincture of I [iodine] resulted in an approximately 82 percent reduction in the uptake of 131I by the thyroid gland. The effectiveness varied among individuals and may have depended on the quantity applied and on the application site. In each study group, elevated levels of serum I were observed. This may be an attractive alternative method of mass protection from radioisotopes of I following nuclear accidents. Serum I concentrations peaked at approximately two hours after topical application of tincture of I.”

Dr. David Brownstein says, “13mg/day of iodine prevents approximately 96 percent of radioactive iodine from binding to the thyroid gland. That is the approximate dosage of iodine ingested daily by the Japanese. This is over 100x the average daily dose ingested by Americans. Please keep in mind it is not just the thyroid gland that is at risk with exposure to radioactive iodine. The breasts, ovaries, uterus, prostate, skin, and other organs all bind and require iodine for optimal functioning. In fact, every cell in our body requires iodine for optimal functioning. Therefore, if we are iodine deficient, exposure to radioactive iodine can potentially result in damage to all the cells of the body. My experience has shown over 95 percent of patients are deficient in iodine. I believe iodine deficiency is one of the underlying causes of the epidemic of cancer of the breast, thyroid, ovaries, uterus and prostate. Furthermore, iodine deficiency is the underlying cause of thyroid disorders including Hashimoto’s disease, Grave’s disease, goiter, and hypothyroidism. Our iodine levels have fallen 50 percent over the last 30 years. During that time, all of the above conditions have been rising at near epidemic rates.”

# # #


Learn Dr Sircus protocol including dosages, methods, side effects and contra-indications. This bundle includes the special edition of Transdermal Magnesium Therapy, Treatment Essentials and Sodium Bicarbonate eBooks.

get yours

Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P)

Director International Medical Veritas Association
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine

Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover


For questions pertaining to your own personal health issues or for specific dosing of Dr. Sircus's protocol items please seek a consultation or visit our knowledge base to see if your question may have been answered previously.
  • Ravenholdm was nothing? like the countrysides, the birds were not singing and the pants were dead and teh dirt was messy and bloody from headcrabs

  • anne

    What is the difference between potassium iodine & nascent iodine? I’ve been taking lugols solution for some time due to hypothyroid do I need to switch to nascent iodine? Please advise.

    Thank you!

  • Bill Sardi

    Twisted facts. Sensationalism at its worst. Radioactivity has reached California, but not enough to contaminate foodstuffs. Yes, in Japan, locally, around the nuclear power plants, yes. Tokyo will receive radiation and yes, the lights are dim.
    Yes, immedilately deadlly at the site of the radiation leaks. Long-term deadly within range of the nuclear sites. You should be ashamed of this report.


    Thank you Claudia for your anwsers. I have one question about your answer to Cathy on today Mar 19. about Edible clay—-you wrote 2tsp per day double normal dosage per lb of bodyweigtht —- for some strange reason that dosen’t make any sinse to me could you explain that again please. Thank you

    • IMVA Staff

      Dear Orv,
      Sorry for the confusing reply on my part about edible earth……For times of radiation danger 2 tsp mixed in spring water should be taken (this is double the usual recommendation) once a day. And for small children the dosage should be 1 tsp per 50 lb of body weight, which is also double the normally recommended dose.

      Claudia French

      • ORV DELANY

        Thank you Claudia very much for your answer that makes perfect since.

  • Elaine

    Dear Dr. Mark,

    Thankyou so very much for putting up these articles in the newsletters. Pointing out the contradictions given in the main stream news vs known scientific facts is the best way to point out why people are non-trusting and suspicious about what we are being told.
    To quote your letter.
    “The Japanese government said Saturday the 19th radioactive iodine turned has already turned up in tap water in Tokyo and five other areas. Of course they add in the double speak saying that it’s only “small but safe amounts of” of some very dangerous stuff.”
    Absolutely! It’s no wonder so many are in a panic.
    Thankfully, I’ve followed your advice using Nascent Iodine, Mag, and bicarb., and therefore have some on hand.
    With this tragedy unfolding in Japan, I heard if you are over 44years old that you need not take any iodine?? How could that be at all true? Don’t our tissues ALWAYS require it?
    I would THINK it does!

    Thankyou for posting your protocols and keeping us informed. I would rather know than not know…..whether I could do anything about it or not.
    I’m one of these people that cannot tolerate being lied to….which is why I find “IMVA” the best source for the best advice. Veritas = Truth.

    Thankyou so much for all you do.

    If you haven’t already seen the video titled, “Beyond Treason”, which is available on YouTube or Google Video. it shows just how much we cannot exactly trust what we are told by our “government”.

    If I’m doing this correctly, here is my attempt to give the link, but it says “embed”

    Otherwise, the link at the top of the page is:

    It is educational to say the least, and eye-opening indeed.
    But I give this link for people maybe put into perspective how much we already have been exposed to and why we should consider always following these protocols for detoxing. We live in a polluted planet. We may know that, but we may not always “realize” it. So if you choose, to post this for others, or to refer to it yourself, I thought I’d add it on.

    Blessings to you always Dr. Mark. God Bless you always. Thankyou for caring for humanity the way you always do.

    • IMVA Staff

      Dear Elaine,

      Thanks for the link to the video” Beyond Treason”.

      We have never heard the recommendation against people over age 44 taking iodine. Please send some link if you have it. We believe any age person can and should use iodine to supplement.

      Claudia French

  • Cathy

    I have some bottles of nascent iodine….HOW MUCH (in drops or mls) should I take each day, how many times a day?????? Dr Brownstein talks about mg…what’s that in mls? How much should I apply topically????? I can’t find your anti-radiation protocol. How much magnesium and how much bicarb, orally or bath or topically should I be using?????? Please please reply!!!! Or circulate an email with a ‘recipe’ for the dosages in your protocol in a straightforward form please. I can’t find it anywhere on your site!

    • IMVA Staff


      Its recommended by Dr. Sircus that 30-40 drops of nascent iodine, in 3 or 4 divided doses (eg. 10 drops four times/day) be taken for about 10 days/2weeks (depending on how long radiation is measured in the atmosphere). Preferably starting before the radiation arrives here.

      Edible Clay should be taken at 2 rounded tsp per day double normal dosage per lb bodyweight plus clay baths a few times/week.

      Magnesium used on the skin daily at 1-2 oz, Magnesium in baths 3 times/ week.

      Sodium Bicarbonate baths 2-3 lb/bath…about 3 times/week or more if radiation effect is heavy.
      Please watch for upcoming changes to recommendations in Dr. Sircus’ daily essays posted on his blog.
      Claudia French

    • IMVA Staff

      for topical application of nascent iodine, just paint a generous amount, enough to cover an area large enough on your abdomen or over your thyroid as described in the essay today. Same if you are using tincture of iodine which are not for ingestion. Don’t panic! Milligrams and milliliters are not the same thing. Various medicines may have 2 mg. per milliliter or some may have 10 mg. per milliliter. Read up on all the iodine essays, to learn more about this.

      Claudia French