Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover
HOMEWorld News

Defeat of Modern Liberalism

Published on November 11, 2016

Image result

The Economist published a rather panicked editorial recently stating that the US presidential contest between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton represents “the gravest risk to the free world since communism,” with “the future of the liberal world order” depending on Clinton’s success.

Well, Clinton failed and with her hopefully goes the liberal world order that has led our current civilization to the edge of a cliff. There is no bottom that anyone can see across the ravine so deep and cutting have been our civilizations mistakes. Unfortunately so bad is the damage that it is doubtful that any form of politics will bring us across safely to the other side.

Ron Paul sees the election results as a big repudiation of the liberal elite. David Stockman writes, “America’s voters fired their ruling elites last night. After 30 years of arrogant misrule and wantonly planting the seeds of economic and financial ruin throughout Flyover America, the Wall Street/Washington establishment and its mainstream media tools have been repudiated like never before in modern history.”

Best not to forget that most republicans have participated gladly in liberal dreams of world order and establishment`s aggression against massive amounts of peoples both domestic (war on drugs) and internationally in endless wars.

It has been hard to tell the difference between Republicans and Democrats until Trump yet it is unclear how much power the new president will have to effect meaningful change. There are more powerful people than presidents but let’s hope this one is strong enough to go up against them. The elections did not make the elites poorer but perhaps some of their power over humanity can be weakened by an exceptionally strong president. Hopefully President Trump will ride in the same traditional as President Andrew Jackson, who fought the banking elites of his time tooth and nail.

Glen Greenwald writes, “Afterward, the elites whose entitlement to prevail was crushed devoted their energies to blaming everyone they could find except for themselves, while doubling down on their unbridled contempt for those who defied them, steadfastly refusing to examine what drove their insubordination. The prevailing institutions of authority in the West, for decades, have relentlessly and with complete indifference stomped on the economic welfare and social security of hundreds of millions of people.”

Learn to diagnose yourself so you can treat yourself and your loved ones! Learn More

Greenwald highlights the fact that, “Democrats knowingly chose to nominate a deeply unpopular, extremely vulnerable, scandal-plagued candidate, who — for very good reason — was widely perceived to be a protector and beneficiary of all the worst components of status quo elite corruption.”

According to the Economist, the current political landscape is one in which the old, “left versus right” divide is being superseded by a “closed versus open” debate in which anti-globalists hoist banners. Globalists and their dreamed one world liberal order of course is not democratic. Nation states have to dissolve themselves into it, which they are not about to do.

Geert Wilders of the Netherlands writes, “Many things are bothering us. There is also much to be angry about, and rightfully so. This government has destroyed our country with its austerity policies and has allowed our country to be colonized by Islam. But let’s start aiming for the imaginable. Let us liberate our country.” He is expressing the sentiment of the rising right`s basic element, which is to protect the women and home society where as liberals are falling all over themselves to ban free speech—any speech that addresses the increasing violence coming from the Islamic world.

Wilders said, “And I will not keep silent about Islam either. Never, ever. Because silence is dangerous. Last July, Nobel Prize winner and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel passed away. I met him a few years ago in New York. He gave the world a wise lesson: “When someone says they want to kill you, believe them.” Islam says it wants to kill us. The Koran leaves no doubt about that.”

Tolerating the Intolerable

Image result

Tolerance is supposed to be the broadest definition or the basic underlying value of a liberal society. Using four letter words does not quite describe the insanity of taking tolerance to the point where you tolerate almost anything. The left is so tolerant, they’re tolerating intolerance.

Liberals can talk all they want about the importance of tolerance but when they stand by and tolerate as masses of women are sexually attacked by Muslim men we get a clear picture of their true colors. When we see their support for the lies of climate change we get a smell of their stench. We when read about their globalist plans we see them for the monsters they are—antidemocratic to the core, elite lapdogs whose ideals make them cruel.

The liberal western media and the elites that own them will not give up declaring that Trump is a disaster for the planet (for the global warming scam). “How were climate scientists, policymaker and diplomats planning to deal with a Donald Trump presidency? The truth is, they weren’t. People who have dedicated their lives to working to save the planet always preferred to focus optimistically on how they could push a President Hillary Clinton further to the left on climate policy.”

Trump’s move to the White House in just a couple of months will almost certainly bring an end to an era of lies and deceptions that exposed environmentalists as Decepticons more mental metal than hearts that were in love with both truth and science. Environmentalists have given liberals a great part of their bad name. They are partially responsible for an abandonment of science in favor of their ideas and ambitions. In their attempts to save they destroy.

The idea that liberals, in the form of international financiers and political elites, would purposely create economic disparity, social chaos and global war out of a desire for centralized power and a disturbed sense of superiority is simply too much for liberals to see about themselves this cruelty at play.

Most liberals enjoy the virtues of a liberal society, and are grateful to live in one, and think the world would in fact be a better place if liberal institutions and values were more widely — even universally — embraced.

I would have agreed many years ago to such values but when I read what is happening with the Islamic invasion of the west, and the women being raped, and societies being threatened, and the pathetic attitudes that excuses liberals come up with it makes me want to run to the right as fast as my feet can take me.

There is a collapse going on of the liberal world. “And language control is thought control. Period. The rise of modern political correctness (PC) is a great example of the cunning way in which social engineers such as the New World Order manipulators operate. Political correctness is soft censorship. It is intolerance disguised as tolerance.

As George Carlin said, it is fascism pretending to be manners. It is running amok not just in Universities but now almost everywhere in society. Just as Orwell laid out so precisely in 1984, political correctness is the Newspeak which is threatening to limit our ability to freely speak and think, by reducing the number of available words in our vocabulary.”

Conclusion

File:Liberal Brain.jpg

Death is coming while liberals are all over themselves playing the blame game. Liberals are right. They know they are right. They insist on being right. They get very indignant if you suggest they are wrong. The worst in liberal intelligence could be expressed, “The idiocy of allowing millions of refugees to flood the continent when their socialist paradise is already bankrupt is beyond comprehension for rational thinking people,” writes the Burning Platform.

Liberals like Clinton ignore the basic teachings of Islam, which teach men to never accept Muslim women as equals and infidel women as nothing more than potential slaves. The left is becoming increasingly lethal with its blinders to the threat of Islamic terrorism, not only of the armed violent type but also of the rapist type. The relationship between Islamic society and honor killing is just another example how Islamic culture is not compatible with the West.

“Donald in effect convinced a huge slice of the electorate that the Clintons amounted to America’s leading crime family,” said David Stockman and that is what being a true blue liberal amounts to in this age of massive deception. It is a crime, though it is a crime shared across all political and social-economic classes. Look at the betrayal of the Greek people at the hands of their leftist politicians.

Simon Black writes, “Hillary Clinton had the full and unabashed backing of the entire media establishment. And the banking establishment. And the political establishment. And countless billionaires, Hollywood celebrities, rock stars, international press, foreign leaders, and even the President of the United States. Yet all of those big guns proved to be ineffective against a citizenry that’s fed up with the status quo.”

The best part of admitting one is wrong is that one then gets to be right. We will not see much of this though because humility is not one of the strong suits of liberals and those who have thrived on the established order.

# # #

BEST SELLER OFFER

Learn Dr Sircus protocol including dosages, methods, side effects and contra-indications. This bundle includes the special edition of Transdermal Magnesium Therapy, Treatment Essentials and Sodium Bicarbonate eBooks.

get yours

Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P)

Director International Medical Veritas Association
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine

Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover

comments

For questions pertaining to your own personal health issues or for specific dosing of Dr. Sircus's protocol items please seek a consultation or visit our knowledge base to see if your question may have been answered previously.
  • Granny Good-Law

    And we thought you were only the magnesium expert! Excellent article, Dr. Sircus. “They get very indignant if you suggest they are wrong” — here’s a story about that.

    Years ago when we decided to homeschool (c. 1986), my research showed me that The Writing Road to Reading was the absolute best program for teaching my children how to read. Our pastor’s wife, Ellen Jensen, was actually a master teacher who taught this to other teachers in private and public school. One day, she related to me an experience with one of her apprentices. Ellen had told them that when they dictate the phonograms, the child is not to have an eraser but a red pencil to go back over his work and correct his errors. One young teacher, apparently taking her training at the Marxist teacher college seriously, was horrified. “You mean, we are going to tell them they are wrong? What about their self-esteem?”

    A generation that cannot take correction, who thinks that they can never be wrong, grows up to be arrogant instead of humble; egocentric instead of other-centered; obstinate instead of weighing all sides of the issue; and they have so much SELF esteem that they cannot tolerate anyone but themselves. Such is this generation.

    If you cannot teach a child that 1 + 1 = 2 without hurting his feelings, then woe unto society when that child meets the real world. He is king and you’d better bow or it’s off with your head. Who will rescue us from these micro-tyrants whose own will is their sovereign?

  • Kiki Corbin

    When the words “right”, “left”, “Republican” and “Democrat” are bantered about, any objective observations about the reality of our country/world get lost.

    Here are a few facts: Less than 30% of voters in the US identify with one of the 2 main parties. Close to 60% consider themselves to be Independent.

    The 2 national parties are simply extensions of Big Business/Billionaire class elites. It doesn’t really matter who is elected President, their agenda keeps moving forward with the Personhood of corporations.

    There is a huge movement by many groups to right this Good Old Boy/Girl system. The vote for Trump was more about a vote against the Clinton dynasty rather than a vote for what people want. The rhetoric of the press totally ignores the reality that there are more parties than the 2 main ones. There were very successful, honorable, intelligent and committed people running from other parties. Did anyone hear anything about them? Were they allowed in the debates or press?

    If the Democratic Party had chosen Sanders, polls showed he would have won. Obviously, he is not the choice of the elites.
    The voting system is rigged. Trump said so himself. (I find that rather humorous.) See Greg Palast, investigative reporter’s report yesterday.

    Rather than bashing our country, it would serve us better to share solutions. We have an exploding population, the environment we depend on to be healthy continues to be poisoned, the food chain has become so toxic that disease is increasing at alarming rates, and government is unimaginably corrupt, just to name a few. Look at the people Trump is appointing. It is the same old guard.

    We all need to give at least some of our time to help change these things, starting at our local government level. Who is honest and wise and willing to run for public office? Who is willing to serve on citizen committees in any of the areas that need change? Who wants to take on voting machine fraud? The list is very long, but we must start somewhere.

    We still have a democracy where we can make a difference. We need to turn off our TVs and get to work for real change, otherwise, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

    • Brad Sharp

      All polls are lies. Mr. Trump proved it. Wall Street $ would not have backed Bernie. America was ready to defeat any sewer progressive liberal or socialist.

  • snappir

    Up until Trump, every US president did not act on its own, but represented the evil plans of their ILLUMINATI secret societies.
    Trump made this point very clearly, stating that he does not represent NOBODY, but his party only. Trump also does not belong to any of these mafia cartels. They are the most powerful american elite, super-multi-super-duper-f…-Billionaires. When they want the economy to go down, they start by publishing articles of gloom all over the american media, which then creates a chain reaction, leading to their goal. When they want a little war, which will bring more billions into their deep pockets, they just give a command to the president…These gangsters wanted to inflame the cold war with Russia, so they just said so to Obama…
    As soon as Hillary Clinton’s membership in the super-powerful Bilderberg mafia has become known to the public, her fate was sealed.
    Another fact that helped Clinton defeat was Trump’s acknowledgement that ISIS was created by US in order to accomplish Obama’s multiple objectives: destruction of Syria and turning it into islamic state, spreading terrorism into Europe to make a point to EU, that US still controls them, to change the map of the middle east….and few others.

  • HCS

    Wonderful article. You are always right on the mark! I prayed long and hard for the defeat of HRC for the benefit of America and all mankind. The progressive liberal agenda has put us on the brink of absolute destruction. The fact that the commentor from Australia below sees the benefits to the whole world with a Trump victory shows the destruction 8 years of liberal control has created for the whole world. Israel is elated by the change in power. I am so very, very grateful to the universe, God and the saints and sages of all time for assisting in turning America back to the right path as envisioned by the founding fathers. They brought us the Electoral College which prevents liberalism from taking over just because a liberal, out of touch (sorry if you live there) state like California has a greater population than the hard working middle of the country. Cudos to you for working to wake up America! Please continue to write such great articles.

  • Carmen Spence

    Dear Dr. SIRCUS
    I share your delight in the victory and triumph od the might strong warrior President Elect Donald Trump
    I am in Australia, but I have been praying for this to happen.
    We here in Australia have Useless Left Parliamentarians but we do have a fiery dinki di Ausie by the name of Pauline Hanson who is standing up to the Traitors Which are Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bisop, Bill Shorton.
    Cory Bernardi is also on our side, but he is still in the Coalitin that the PM Malcolm Turnbull is in.,

  • Your commentary is interesting, but you miss some of the nuances, being down there in Brazil. Mr. Trump received a minority of the votes – not even a plurality. The election did not show any end to modern liberalism; it showed only how divided this country has become in political matters.

    • Charmaine Taylor

      Stick around, and watch what happens. Possibly all the dead liberals and illegals who ‘vote’ will get property ‘recounted’ and eliminated, further shaming poor Hillary. … You understood the way the Electoral College works right? Popular vote has NEVER been the way we elect a president. and even the small popular vote percentage difference may be tidily cleared up when FAIR recounts are shown.

      • One of the surviving documents from the Constitutional Convention shows that on September 15, 1787 – two days before the Constitution was signed – there was a gathering for which the delegates ordered 54 bottles of Madeira, 60 bottles of Claret, 8 bottles of whiskey, 8 bottles of cider, 12 bottles of beer, and 7 bowls of alcoholic punch. This was needed for 55 people. Perhaps that helps to explain the electoral college.

        However, whenever I read comments like yours, I better understand why the Framers of the Constitution came up with the idea. They understood that the average person can easily become emotional about “political” issues. They didn’t want those nasty emotions to influence important national decisions, so they did everything they could to leave the important decisions to the few people they thought could be trusted – people who could get together and work things out over a few beers … and a lot of wine … and some spiked punch. In the early days, most of the states let their legislatures choose the Electors, so the “People” did not get to vote for either the president or for those who would vote for the president. The system worked initially because George Washington was so popular that it was a number of years before those like Hamilton and Burr took up their dueling pistols. That system has had a good run, but clearly we are at the point where a president should be directly elected … by the People … with a much more limited campaign period.

        • Patty Wright

          And make sure the majority of those people are looking to be cared for by the big benevolent communistic type government by importing them in droves through illegals and amnesty and allowing legals in only from other loser nations who are already under the NWO sponsored failed system of communism so those in power can remain in power in perpetuity.

          • Although I still think that most Americans are intelligent enough to be responsible for directly electing the president, thank you for illustrating why the founding fathers had reason to question the intelligence of the average voter.