Cancer carries an aura of menace unique among diseases for its prevalence and the punishing nature of its treatments. Most mainstream cancer treatments require bombarding the body as well as the disease with toxic chemicals and radiation. Slash, poison, and burn cancer care is often equated with warfare. However, within the mainstream cancer establishment, a growing movement is to do nothing, which some say is a possible life-saving cancer treatment.
Everyone knows that mainstream cancer treatments can undermine health and even kill you quicker than the cancer will, so some oncologists admit that the cost and side effects just aren’t worth it. Yet, for patients, the urge to do something can be overpowering.
Watchful waiting reduces the toll of unnecessary cancer treatments, both financially and in terms of patient suffering. While few currently choose this less invasive path, growing awareness of its benefits is gradually entering clinical practice.
The urge to fight cancer aggressively fuels a vast industry in the United States. Millions undergo treatments with limited effectiveness, preferring action over the potentially more healthful option of “watchful waiting.” The watch-and-wait approach is typically advised for certain early-stage or slow-growing cancers where immediate treatment does not improve survival rates. This strategy is most common with prostate cancer but is also considered for breast, thyroid, and some blood cancers.
However, the entire framework of modern oncology ignores what is beneficial for their patients. Oncologists refuse to consider anything and everything natural as substitutes for their aggressive treatments even though in emergency rooms and ICU, there are potent natural medicines they could be using. Oncologists are like racehorses with blinders; they are blind, deaf, and dumb to natural chemotherapy. It is insane to do nothing no matter how early doctors detect cancer when there are so many good, safe, and effective things one can do to facilitate health and to push back on cancer even in its earliest stages.
Natural does not mean weaker.
An oncologist will never recommend magnesium, bicarbonates, iodine, selenium, hydrogen/oxygen inhalation, and carbon dioxide (for starters), which is much more than doing nothing. Even chlorine dioxide, which water experts use to clean water, can be used as a primary substance. It is ridiculous not to employ the prime substances of life when facing cancer. It might seem strange, but there are very potent natural substances that, when concentrated at high dosages, can stop cancer.
But do not mention this to your oncologist. They do not want to know. Modern oncology has fallen in love with itself so much that it reasons only from its own point of view without even considering that there are alternatives to its very nasty approaches.
However, people below the age of 50 are getting cancer more than ever before — and doctors are stumped as to why. “Cancer is hitting more young people in the U.S. and around the globe, baffling doctors. Federal data show that diagnosis rates in the U.S. rose in 2019 to 107.8 cases per 100,000 people under 50, up 12.8% from 95.6 in 2000. A study in BMJ Oncology last year reported a sharp global rise in cancers in people under 50, with the highest rates in North America, Australia and Western Europe.”
“We are seeing more and more young people who don’t fit the classic teaching that cancer is a disease of aging,” said Monique Gary, the medical director of the cancer program at Pennsylvania’s Grand View Health Center.
Mild Cases of Cancer, If It Exists
While the terms are often used interchangeably, the American Cancer Society differentiates between “active surveillance” and “watchful waiting.” Active surveillance involves regular doctor visits, blood tests, and biopsies, while watchful waiting implies a more relaxed follow-up based on symptoms.
I always tell anyone with cancer to assume the worst and treat it with natural chemo and natural radiation that have zero side effects. It is safer and cheaper to assume the worst and employ the most potent natural treatments one can afford. This means one can skip most, if not all, of the dangerous cancer-provoking tests and go right to treatments if those treatments are natural.
“One of the reasons to think about active surveillance and delaying treatment is to prevent side effects, which almost always accompany treatment for cancer, including problems related to surgery,” writes Stanford oncologist Dr. Lidia Schapira for the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
A 2012 study published by The New England Journal of Medicine reported no significant survival difference after 12 years between men with early-stage prostate cancer who underwent surgery and those who opted for watchful waiting. “Absolute differences in mortality between the study groups were less than three percentage points,” wrote the authors, adding that a subgroup of men with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values or higher-risk tumors may have benefitted from surgery.
More recent findings suggest even if cancer progresses during active surveillance, that does not decrease the high survival rate. The study found that 97 percent of men with localized prostate cancer survive for at least 15 years, irrespective of treatment. However, researchers pointed out that side effects impacting urinary and sexual function in those opting for treatment could persist for over a decade.
Doing Something
Some oncologists will give lip service to nutrition as a cornerstone of the watching and waiting approach, noting its importance in strengthening the immune system and engaging the body’s defenses against cancer. But they have no idea about nutritional medicine and what to recommend.
No doubt vital to this approach are lifestyle modifications such as regular exercise, stress management, restorative sleep, and nurturing relationships, which collectively form a comprehensive support system for cancer patients, regardless of treatment protocol.
Baking Soda
The most basic, powerful, and inexpensive chemotherapy is sodium bicarbonate, though you will never hear anything about it anywhere in the medical world. That, and applying carbon dioxide medicine and breathing retraining, add up to much more than doing nothing. So much more!
It is worth repeating many times that sodium bicarbonate is the first medicine to reach for when facing cancer. It is powerful enough to clear the kidneys of uranium toxicity and mitigate the toxicity of chemotherapy while allowing, at the same time, killer T cells to dig deep into the nastiest tumors. Medical Miracles with Carbon Dioxide and Bicarbonates provides vital information on surviving and even curing cancer.
Conclusion
I genuinely believe that oncologists are the most ridiculous people on earth, though they do have tremendous competition from every other branch of medicine. I do not know what doctors are these days, but they certainly are not practicing rational medicine. When it comes to cancer or any other disease, if the first thing recommended is not bicarbonates and magnesium, then they are guilty of medical malpractice. To come out of a desert completely dehydrated and a doctor not giving water to drink would be an excellent example of such medical ignorance.
comments