We are being warned that the epidemic may not end until the world has a vaccine against the disease, according to Professor Peter Piot, director of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He is one of the scientists who discovered the virus.
There are three vaccines now being fast-tracked through early safety trials in volunteers in the UK, the US and in unaffected Mali to ensure that they do no harm, reports the Guardian but the safest vaccines still have their problems and sometimes their toxicity seriously hurts and kill people without help from any virus.
Test results should be available by the end of November or start of December, which would be a record and extremely reckless development time. If they are acceptable, according to CDC standards, it is likely that healthcare workers – who are at highest risk of being infected and over 200 of whom have died – will be offered a vaccination before Christmas. “But the only proof that any of them works will be if there is a significant drop in the number of deaths among vaccinated people on the front line.”
The National Institute of Health has declared that rushed "Ebola" vaccines may need to be given to everyone. Obviously this is the plan but the vaccine will not actually be for Ebola – not really. Connecticut, which does not even have a single case of Ebola yet, has taken pre-emptive action and can now force vaccines and detain people without due process. The federal government has these laws already in place when a national health emergency is declared.
When it comes to health and medical emergencies people’s individual rights are very limited. Vaccinations can be forced on people as can quarantine. Isolation separates people who are known to be ill from those who aren’t sick. Quarantine separates people suspected of being exposed to an illness or biological agent from the general population.
Vaccines May Not Be Enough
If vaccines are the only way to get the Ebola pandemic under control then God help the human race. The Canadian press is reporting, “As West Africa’s Ebola outbreak continues to rage, some experts are coming to the conclusion that it may take large amounts of vaccines and maybe even drugs – all still experimental and in short supply – to bring the outbreak under control. Embedded in that notion is the reality that the catastrophic epidemic may remain unchecked for months, given that these products haven’t yet been proven to be safe or effective in people, and won’t be available in significant amounts any time soon. Experimental Ebola drugs in particular will remain in scarce supply for a considerable time.”
Dr. Adrian Hill of the Jenner Institute at Oxford University said about Ebola vaccine development, "We are trying to do in a few months something that might typically take 10 years.” But even if researchers are able to make enough vaccine, and have data showing that it is safe for use in humans and produces good immune responses, Hill said that they would not know that "it actually works. So we’re going to have to figure out a way of using the vaccine, and at the same time evaluating it. And there’s a great deal of discussion about how you might do that now.”
“It is conceivable that this epidemic will not turn around even if we pour resources into it. It may just keep going and going and it might require a vaccine,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. “As the epidemic gets more and more formidable and in some cases out of control it is quite conceivable, if not likely, that we may need to deploy the vaccine to the entire country to be able to shut the epidemic down. That is clearly a possibility.” Obviously populations will need to be stampeded with fear to take the vaccine but that is being accomplished with constant media reports.
If you listen only to contemporary medicine the only real way to treat viruses is with vaccines meaning they hope to prevent infections but once a person is infected they do nothing but add factors that contribute to more deaths. The vaccine wing of modern medicine is untrustworthy and today more and more parents are taking notice and are avoiding vaccinating their children or are doing so as late as possible.
The prospects of “countrywide” vaccination for Ebola with a rushed-to-market vaccination are absolutely horrifying. Recall that some 800 children in Europe are now suffering narcolepsy thanks to the rushed swine flu vaccine. Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper wrote :
Some people may say, “Oh, that was an experimental drug, rushed to market to fight an epidemic.” The thing is, if you look at it that way, every flu vaccine is “experimental”. Each year’s batch contains something different, because it has to be ever-evolving as viruses mutate. Despite this, people are terrified and guilted into receiving the vaccine. If the fear factor doesn’t work, they are forced to take it in order to work, go to school, or stay at daycare.
Mike Adams, the popular Health Ranger, puts it all together saying:
The vaccine won’t be tested against Ebola. It will be "approved" by the FDA in record time without ever being shown to be effective. Drugs are typically tested against people who have the disease the drug claims to treat. For example, high blood pressure drugs are tested in people who have high blood pressure to determine whether the drug "works" to lower their blood pressure. These results are typically compared to a control group which also has high blood pressure but received a placebo. The difference in results across these two groups is attributed to the drug.
A properly-constructed Ebola vaccine trial, then, would also have to use two groups of people: a control group which receives no vaccine and then gets exposed to Ebola, and a treated group that receives the vaccine and then gets exposed to Ebola. The difference in the outcomes of the two groups would be attributed to the vaccine. Obviously, no vaccine clinical trial is going to intentionally expose anyone to Ebola. Thus, the question of whether the vaccine even works against Ebola won’t be answered even when the vaccine is "approved" for use in the population.
Clinical trials won’t test vaccine’s efficacy against Ebola. Instead of testing whether the vaccine works against Ebola, the clinical trials are only trying to determine whether the vaccine causes side effects and produces an immune response. As Dr. Myron Levine, director of the Center for Vaccine Development (CVD) at the University of Maryland, explains, “This research will give us crucial information about whether the vaccine is safe, well tolerated and capable of stimulating adequate immune responses in the highest priority target population, health care workers in West Africa.”
Note carefully that he does not say the clinical trial will tell them whether the vaccine actually halts Ebola transmission. What they are looking for in this trial is whether the vaccine causes side effects and whether it produces an "immune response" of antibodies.
These antibodies, it turns out, are not Ebola antibodies. They are antibodies to a tiny chain of proteins (that resemble one part of Ebola) attached to an adenovirus (a common cold virus). The hope among vaccine developers is that the antibodies which appear in response to this artificially engineered protein structure will also work against Ebola. But there will be no proof of this. It will simply be a "best guess" and may not work at all.
The government is crazy enough to allow pharmaceutical companies to put neurotoxic mercury (Thimerosal) in the flu vaccine and inject that directly into children’s blood streams and that is reason enough to not put trust in the CDC. Mike Adams also reports that, “Recent lab tests conducted at the Natural News Forensic Food Lab found that seasonal flu vaccines, which are pushed on virtually everyone these days, including young babies, pregnant women and the elderly, contain outrageously high levels of neurotoxic mercury. Vials of batch flu vaccine produced by British pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) were found to contain upwards of 51 parts per million of mercury, or 25,000 times the legal maximum for drinking water established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).”
According to a NY Times essay on flu vaccines several years ago, “As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people getting them will drop dead of heart attacks or strokes, some children will have seizures and some pregnant women will miscarry. Inevitably, officials say, some of these will happen within hours or days of a flu shot.” The Times essay downplayed the connection but in another report we read, “About a week after getting the swine flu shot, she recalled, “I was so weak I couldn’t push down the toaster button.” This woman spent a month in the hospital, paralyzed from the neck down, before gradually recovering.”
There is little doubt that vaccines are dangerous (American government pays out billions in vaccine damages). Most compensated cases were for flu vaccine damages, especially due to the paralyzing Guillain-Barre syndrome. In fact it should come as no surprise that vaccines kill people because that is what medicine does as a matter of habit. There are constant reports from around the world about vaccines hurting people. One of the more recent:
A mystery illness is plaguing girls in this town in northern Colombia, and locals say a vaccine against the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus, or HPV, is to blame. First their hands and feet feel cold. Then they go pale and cannot move. Some convulse and fall to the floor. In El Carmen de Bolivar, near the port of Cartagena, dozens of teenagers have experienced similar symptoms. Some have even lost consciousness. "They vaccinated me in May and I started fainting in August. My legs became heavy and I couldn’t feel my hands anymore. When I woke up, I was in the hospital," recalled 15-year-old Eva Mercado. She passed out seven times in a month.
For most of the families affected in this town of 67,000, there is no doubt about what is causing the problem. They place the blame squarely on a vaccination campaign against HPV, one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases, which can trigger cervical cancer.
“The flu vaccine may pose an immediate risk to your cardiovascular system due to the fact that vaccines provoke an acute inflammatory response in the body that can become chronic in some individuals. The inflammatory response is a MAJOR concern in pregnant women, as stimulating a woman’s immune system during pregnancy can increase health risks for the pregnant woman and some researchers think that it increases risks that the baby will develop neurological dysfunction anywhere from 7 to 14-fold!”
Vaccine damages are no one’s illusion. Vaccines are dangerous. On the 20th of January 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said there had been 36 confirmed reports of seizures that flu season in children ages 6 months through 2 years in the United States. The seizures occurred within one day after they were vaccinated with Fluzone, the only flu shot recommended in America for infants and very young children.
True medicine cries out against vaccines and all the harm they are doing to children and people around the globe but we have medical authorities claiming them to offer deliverance when in reality they offer little of anything but further toxic attacks on the body and immune system.
Vaccines Reduce Natural Immunity
This T cell (blue), one of the immune system’s principal means of defense.
Dr. Harold E. Buttram wrote many years ago about a little-noted letter-to-the editor in the New England Journal of Medicine, in 1984, about an interesting German study. In the study, a significant though temporary drop of T-helper lymphocytes was found in 11 healthy adults following routine tetanus booster vaccinations. “Special concern rests in the fact that, in 4 of the subjects, the T-helper lymphocytes fell to levels seen in active AIDS patients. The implications of this study are enormous. In regards to this German study, if this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy adults, it is sobering to think of the possible consequences of multiple vaccines (18 vaccines within the first six months of life at latest count) given to infants with their immature and vulnerable immune systems,” wrote Buttram.
The New England Journal of Medicine study showed that tetanus vaccines cause T-cell ratios to drop below normal, with the greatest decrease after two weeks. Though the altered ratios were found to be similar to those found in AIDS victims the important information from this study has never seen the light of day. “I consider it one of the most flagrant examples of negligence in the area of safety testing in childhood vaccines, the fact that this study has never been repeated,” wrote Buttram.