Cancer rates are going up. They are climbing into the sky, but as expected, we hear the usual: they don’t know why. They guess, of course. The researchers postulate a range of potential contributors to the trend, including the escalating rates of obesity coupled with lifestyle choices such as alcohol consumption, smoking, sedentary habits, and inadequate sleep, but that is not half of it.
Environmental elements, including exposure to carcinogenic chemicals and pollutants, are also believed to play a pivotal role. However, modern medicine cannot address or treat toxic exposures because the medical-industrial complex is busy using carcinogenic drugs and radiation. There is no chance oncologists will finger themselves as a significant cause of cancer.
However, doctors are one of the leading causes of cancer; no wonder we have lost the war on cancer. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are both intrinsically carcinogenic treatments. Take the cancer drug tamoxifen, for example. It is classified by the World Health Organization and the American Cancer Society as a human carcinogen. It has been documented to cause over two dozen health-destroying side effects, yet it is still used as a first-line treatment for certain types of breast cancer.
We will not hear that the surge in radiation exposure from medical tests could contribute to the rise of cancer. Nor will you hear from oncologists that since COVID-19 vaccines were given to about 5 billion people, there has been a sudden rise in cancer and overall death rates. Oncologists refuse to connect genetic injections to the rapid decline of health and the increase in sudden death and cancer.
Cancer is hard enough to treat even under the best circumstances, but it is murderous when genetic injections provoke it. Early in 2022, Senator Ron Johnson hosted a conference in Washington D.C. called “Second Opinion.” One of the speakers at this 5-hour recorded event was attorney Thomas Renz, who, in the short time allotted to him, testified that three military medical professionals had become whistleblowers, putting their careers on the line to expose data contained in the Department of Defense Medical Database, under oath and penalty of perjury, regarding a nearly 300% increase in cancer, and over a 1000% increase in neurological injuries. Renz stated: “Our soldiers are being experimented on, injured, and sometimes possibly killed.” (by the COVID-19 vaccines.)
The deliberately made COVID-19 Bioweapon may predispose recovered cancer patients to cancer development and accelerate cancer progression. This hypothesis is based on growing evidence of the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to modulate oncogenic pathways, promote chronic low-grade inflammation, and cause tissue damage. Mainstream oncology refuses to consider this and thus remains silent on this issue yet many doctors are weighing in on what are called “Turbo Cancers.” The list of people is growning who are coming to admit that the biggest mistake of their life was to subject themselves to the genetic vaccines.
Eighty years ago millions had to be forced at gunpoint into Nazi concentration camps where untold numbers were subjected to medical experimentation. Today we have evolved with billions rolling up their sleeves with smiles on their faces desperate for their shots, no guns needed. I guess they just wanted to make the CEO of Pfizer into the best paid pharmaceutical executive in the business.
The entire edifice of the vaccine world is
built on the principle of human sacrifice.
Long COVID—and the increased risk of death, disability, and hospitalization—can persist for two years, according to a landmark study published in Nature Medicine. For those who contracted the virus in 2020 and were hospitalized with it, the risk of death and hospitalization remained “significantly elevated” for two years, according to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Washington University researchers.
The CDC now says that the new COVID lineage could cause infections in vaccinated individuals, meaning the vaccines given so far are good for nothing. That means more genetic shots are on the way, so expect even more cancer among the vaccinated, and this is just part of the story of why cancer rates and death will continue to skyrocket.
Don’t Breathe The Smoke!
The Weather Network reported recently that in areas of Eastern and Midwestern Canada and the United States where wildfire smoke has been heavy, residents have noticed a burnt plastic smell in the air. Kang Sun, an assistant professor at the University at Buffalo studying the chemistry and physics of the Earth’s atmosphere, explained to The New York Times that when biomass like branches, trees, and leaves burn, they spew volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the air.
As the VOCs linger in the air, they interact with ultraviolet (UV) radiation to create pollutants like benzene and formaldehyde, which smell like burning plastic. Michael Jerrett, a professor of environmental health science at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, told The New York Times that these chemicals are “certainly a health concern.” Benzene and formaldehyde are classified by the World Health Organization as Group 1 carcinogens, meaning there is sufficient evidence that they cause cancer in humans.
The American Lung Association says wildfire smoke can be “extremely harmful” to lung health. Wildfire smoke consists of a mix of air pollutants, including particle pollution, like PM2.5. These tiny particles can get lodged deep in the lungs and cause asthma attacks, heart attacks, and strokes.
Researchers from Harvard University’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health found PM2.5 may increase the risk of developing dementia, according to a report published in the medical journal BMJ in April. Other studies also show a link between wildfire exposure and increased mortality, respiratory illnesses, and cancer.
However, neither of these studies nor organizations are calculating mercury and radiation toxicity from the fires.
Have You Ever Heard An Oncologist Talk About Mercury?
Mercury is the most potent enzyme inhibitor; it is in a class of its own and deserves its title as the most toxic non-radioactive element. Because mercury and lead attach themselves to highly vulnerable junctures of proteins, they find their extraordinary capacity to provoke biochemical shifts and morphological changes in the body.
Forests are considered a pool of mercury in the global mercury cycle. Forest fires release more mercury into the atmosphere than previously recognized, a multidisciplinary research project at the University of Michigan suggested in 2007. The problem of mercury emissions assumes an alarming proportion once we consider that mercury is highly mobile and travels far and wide. It is a grave danger even for populations with no significant mercury-polluting sources.
Wildfires are releasing mercury long ago sequestered, yet since 2006, genuinely massive amounts of mercury have been spread around the globe. Total annual mercury emissions into the air from all its sources are estimated to exceed 5000-7000 tons (Mason et al. 1994; Lamborg et al. 2002; Gray and Hines 2006). Since the turn of the century, approximately 138,000 tons of mercury have been spread around the globe, and that is the discounted amount since China and India have been building massive amounts of coal-fired plants since these numbers were calculated.
Up and down the eastern part of the United States, we find high levels of mercury. No one in mainstream medicine is taking into account the intensifying increase in background mercury contamination of fish, water, air, soil, and foods or calculating the hundreds of trillions of mercury atoms and molecules absorbed directly each day, day after day, year after year through having gram weight quantities placed directly in the mouth with dental amalgam. The FDA of course thinks it is absolutely safe to put mercury inches from the brain but elsewhere around the world more sane health authorities beg to disagree.
Dr. Rashid Buttar, who some people believe was recently murdered, testified before Congress that “the association of mercury to chronic diseases is well documented in the didactic scientific literature. The search for the association between mercury and cardiovascular disease reveals 358 scientific papers exemplifying the relationship; we find 643 scientific papers between mercury and cancer. The association of mercury with neurodegenerative diseases is the most significant, with references numbering 1,445.” The official position currently is that there is “some” evidence that methylmercury can cause cancer in humans. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified methylmercury as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”
“There is no safe level of mercury, and no one has actually shown that there is a safe level,” said Dr. Lars Friberg, Chief Adviser to the WHO on mercury safety. According to the observations made by the internationally recognized medical researcher Yoshiaki Omura, MD, all cancer cells have mercury in them.
A growing body of scientific research suggests heavy metals contribute to carcinogenesis by inducing/increasing oxidative stress.[i] Oxidative stress damages DNA and can lead to mutations that promote cancer. Heavy metals also disrupt the process of Apoptosis (programmed cell death). Apoptosis is vital for safely removing sick/unhealthy cells, including cells that may become cancerous.
Around Chornobyl, when a forest burned intensely for only 90 minutes, it released cesium-137, strontium-90, and plutonium-238, -239, and -240 in blasts of smoke and heat. In just one hour, the firefighters were exposed to more than triple the annual radiation limit for Chornobyl’s nuclear workers. The blazes released radiation trapped for decades in the soil surrounding the Ukrainian city of Prypiat abandoned in 1986 following an explosion at the nearby Chernobyl nuclear power plant that caused the world’s worst nuclear accident, that is, until Fukushima.
Naturally occurring radionuclides, such as those of the uranium and thorium series and artificial radionuclides, are accumulated in plants. Summer vegetation fires release these natural and man-made radionuclides into the atmosphere. Concentrations of uranium isotopes 238U, 235U, 234U, 232Th, 230Th, 226Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po were measured in smoke from wild vegetation fires. It is shown that radionuclide concentrations in smoke particles are enhanced about 100 times in comparison with the vegetation of the area and with reference aerosols.
Unfortunately, contemporary oncology cannot give us the answers we need and the necessary therapy for cancer patients that will win the war on cancer. Oncologists cannot even give us a coherent picture of cancer and how to avoid it. They keep parading one promising substance after another with big futuristic promises that are never kept.
Kevin Harrington, a professor of biological cancer therapies at The Institute of Cancer Research and an honorary consultant oncologist at the Royal Marsden (RMH) and St George’s Hospital in London, says, “In 20 years, I confidently expect we will cure a substantially larger number of cancer patients,” he said. “And we will cure them with far smarter and kinder treatments than current approaches.” This does not mean there will ever be a single cure for cancer, said Dr. Claire Bromley, Cancer Research U.K.’s senior science communications manager.
One recent headline, ‘Five breakthroughs pushing us closer to a cure for cancer.’ How often have we read of new research, new drugs promising cancer cures? It is a cruel joke as cancer mortality and incidence are getting worse, not better. One of their favorite drugs they say will eradicate cancer, AOH1966, will take at least five to 10 years to gain approval in the U.K.
Rates of colorectal cancer have been increasing in young people. A new study finds that early-onset cancer — defined as cancer in people younger than 50 — increased from 2010 to 2019. In 2019, the highest number of cases of early-onset cancer were in the breast — 12,649 — but during the study period, gastrointestinal cancers had the fastest-growing rates of early-onset cancer.
According to a new report, gastrointestinal cancers—including colorectal, pancreatic, and bile duct—are being diagnosed more often and faster in younger adults than a decade ago. A study published in JAMA Network Open showed early-onset gastrointestinal cancers not only had the most significant increase in the number of new cases (from 6,431 cases in 2010 to 7,383 cases in 2019, or a 14.8% increase) but also had the fastest increase, rising at a rate of 2.16% per year.
Death and Harm by Oncology
Oncologists do not understand the most fundamental cause of every type of cancer: hypoxia. Oxygen deficiency causes cells to turn to fermentation, the hallmark of cancer metabolism. Dr. Robert Rowan says, “Dr. Otto Warburg emphasized that you can’t make a cell ferment unless a LACK OF OXYGEN is involved. In 1955, two American scientists, R.A. Malmgren, and C.C. Flanigan, confirmed Warburg’s findings. They found that oxygen deficiency is ALWAYS present when cancer develops.”
Information About Forever Chemicals and Cancer
It is a little late after widespread contamination, but they are finally saying that there’s growing evidence that regular exposure to man-made “forever” chemicals, which are used in a variety of household products, are linked to rising cancer rates. And that is a big problem when you consider that “forever chemicals” have been found in 45% of the nation’s tap water, according to a recent government study.
A new study that examined the correlation between liver cancer and the presence of these chemicals in humans found that people with the highest levels of exposure have 350% greater odds of eventually developing the disease.
The term “forever” chemicals refers to the more than 4,700 available types of perfluoroalkyl and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, used widely across manufacturing industries — named as such because the substances degrade very slowly and build up over time in soil, drinking water, and in the body.
PFAS were first introduced in the 1930s as a revolutionary material used in the creation of nonstick cookware — hello, Teflon — and soon adapted to all sorts of products and packaging — from construction materials to cosmetics — that benefit from its liquid- and fire-resistant properties, as noted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A new study suggests per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as forever chemicals or PFAS, reduce the activity of human immune cells.
Dr. Gunda Herberth, an environmental immunologist, and other scientists examined the impact of PFAS on immune cells from the blood of healthy donors. Herberth said, “Studies have shown that PFAS can be detected in the blood of almost everyone in the world. What this means for our long-term health is not yet known.”
Oncologists seem to understand little about cancer but much about dangerous toxic tests, toxic chemotherapy, hazardous radiation treatments, and surgery. Perhaps we should have some compassion for these doctors who have had the worst possible medical education. They just do not know any better, meaning they know not what they do and are not conscious of the harm they are doing. Of course, that is true, or they would not be able to sleep at night.
I would offer my cancer course to reeducate them about the multiple causes of cancer and safer treatments that address these causes, but I would be wasting my time, no doubt. Though my course is part of a doctoral program for Naturopathic medicine, I offer it inexpensively to patients so they can quickly know more than their oncologists, which is easy since their doctors know so little.
[i] Mitochondria as an important target in heavy metal toxicity in rat hepatoma AS-30D cells;Belyaeva EA, Dymkowska D, Wieckowski MR, Wojtczak L.j; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008 Aug 15;231(1):34-42. Epub 2008 Apr 7. PubMed