Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover

Does the Dose Make the Poison or Not?

Published on October 4, 2012

Description: paracelsus0

Auroleus Phillipus Theostratus Bombastus von Hohenheim, immortalized as “Paracelsus” and sometimes called “the father of toxicology,” was born in 1493. Paracelsus, a Swiss doctor, pioneered the use of chemicals and minerals in medicine. His name appears as a significant figure among voluminous numbers of works on homeopathy, natural medicine, alternative medicine, and botanical studies. Many see him as the predecessor of chemical pharmacology and therapeutics and the most original medical thinker of the 16th century. Paracelsus was the first to say, “It depends only upon the dose whether a poison is a poison or not. A lot kills; a little cures.” So he would take a very toxic substance like mercury and use it to cure epilepsy, something no one in his right mind would do now.

With the exception of E = mc2, perhaps no other single statement has wielded such force in establishing the popular notoriety and the professional stature of an individual in the history of science as the dose makes the poison. It would be difficult to imagine either the medical or pharmaceutical world today without this principle in operation. Now we have to question, is allopathic medicine killing millions with this principle?

It is thought that if the dose is low enough, even a highly toxic substance will cease to cause a harmful effect. The toxic potency of a chemical is thus ultimately defined by the dose (the amount) of the chemical that will produce a specific response in a specific biological system. “In all of these debates, the key point that is not often understood is that it’s the dose that makes the poison,” says Dr. Carl Winter, an expert in toxicology at the University of California, Davis. “The tendency is to exaggerate toxicity. It’s a slippery slope where to draw the line on what represents a legitimate concern and what restrictions should apply.”[1]

Learn a system of medicine that is safe, simple and affordable! Discover Dr Sircus Natural Allopathic Medicine »

This is of course not true for something as strong as plutonium. The crucial issue with plutonium is not volume or mass—it’s toxicity. In principle, using the Atomic Energy Control Board’s (AECB) regulatory limits, we can calculate that 0.1 micrograms can overdose one person with maximum safe exposure limits being placed at .56 micrograms maximum full body exposure and .25 micrograms for lung exposure. Experiments with beagle dogs suggest that about 27 millionths of a gram of insoluble plutonium would be sufficient to cause lung cancer in an adult human being with virtual certainty, with significant risks probably associated with far lower doses,” reports International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War.[2]

A Dartmouth professor studying the chemical characteristics
of an organic form of mercury—diethyl mercury—spilled two
drops of it on her gloved hand. The first sign of mercury
poisoning occurred four months later when her speech
began to be slurred. This was followed by difficulty walking
and loss of vision. She then fell into a coma and died.

Karen Wetterhahn’s accident showed that dimethylmercury was far more toxic than anyone thought.[3] “A usual mercury concentration would be ten micrograms per liter of blood or less. If the level rises to 50 micrograms per liter you’ve hit the toxic threshold, the beginning of toxicity. You would begin chelation therapy. A concentration of 200 micrograms per liter is toxic, but not necessarily lethal. Karen had 4,000 micrograms per liter. That’s 80 times the toxic threshold,” said Dr. John Winn the chairman of the chemistry department at Dartmouth. Merely absorbing a drop or two placed her in the lethal range. “Everyone knew dimethylmercury was bad,” said Dr. Kent Sugden but “no one knew it was this bad.” “On a scale of one to ten, dimethylmercury was a 15,” says chemistry professor Dean Wilcox. “Before Karen’s accident we thought it was a ten. Now we know it is off the scale.”[4]

Toxic effects of chemical agents are often not well understood or appreciated by doctors and even less so by the general public. Medicine has struggled to understand the toxicities of individual chemicals but is feeble when it comes to understanding the impacts of exposure to mixtures of chemicals. It is known for instance that aluminum and lead increase the toxicities of mercury by 100-fold yet that does not stop doctors from mixing aluminum with mercury in children’s vaccines. Tobacco smoking coupled with asbestos exposure increases the risk of lung cancer by 25-fold.

I for my part am ashamed of medicine,
considering what an utter fraud it has come to be.

“The prolonged effects of low grade concentrations of toxic substances depend on individual susceptibility,” says Professor I. M. Trakhtenberg from the former Soviet Union. The science of low-level toxicity shows that it matters what is happening on the parts per million, per billion and even per trillion level. As our instruments have become infinitely more sensitive, scientists have been able to penetrate into new worlds of chemical sensitivity that Paracelsus could not have possibly imagined. What industry and government have hidden in the low numbers seen in parts per million becomes astronomical when calculated and plotted out as parts per trillion.

In 1995, neurotoxicologist and former director of toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, published research showing that fluoride built up in the brains of animals when exposed to moderate levels.[5] Rats drinking only one part per million fluoride (NaF) (million parts per trillion) in water had histologic lesions in their brains similar to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.

Sheldon Krimsky’s book, Hormonal Chaos, describes endocrine disruption as a paradigm shift in toxicology that fits the realities of low-level toxicity. Low-level toxicities that gradually build up or wear on the body day after day and year after year operate differently than acute chemical exposures. Instead of the brute force of large numbers of toxic substances, a small number of molecules can hijack the hormonal control of development and undermine the immune system, erode intelligence, and diminish reproductive capacity. Endocrine disruption is occurring at contamination levels far beneath those of traditional concern to toxicologists and can go on for years without either patient or physician being aware.

Arsenic acts as a growth stimulant in chickens
—it develops the meat faster—and the poultry
industry has gone wild using this ingredient.
Donald Herman

The Romans were aware that lead could cause serious health problems, even madness and death. However, they were so fond of its diverse uses that they minimized the hazards it posed. What they did not realize was that their everyday low-level exposure to the metal rendered them vulnerable to chronic lead poisoning, even while it spared them the full horrors of acute lead poisoning. Roman engineers in the end brought down the Roman Empire when they replaced their stone aqueducts with lead pipes for the transport and supply of drinking water, thus turning much of the Roman population into neurological cripples.[7]

Today instead of Roman engineers using lead we have vaccine manufacturers using thimerosal, dentists pouring the mercury into people’s mouths, and industry dumping it into the environment in obscene quantities. We have health officials putting fluoride in the drinking water, which increases the uptake of lead, which is still present in modern plumbing fixtures, all together creating a devil’s triangle of toxicity with mercury throwing the knockout punch.

The top five causes of poisoning in a recent study were, in order,
antidepressant medications, analgesics such as aspirin,
street drugs, cardiovascular drugs and alcohol.
Royal Society of Chemistry

In reality, Natural Allopathic Medicine is opposite to orthodox allopathic practice and principle in that instead of using low doses of poisons, like what the pharmaceutical companies produce, we use high doses of concentrated nutritional substances that only bring good when used with reason and sensitivity.

Part Two Tomorrow– The Key is in the Dose

[1] Christian Science Monitor. June 3, 2005 – California takes aim at chemicals in plastics

[2] Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Plutonium, Deadly Gold of the Nuclear Age, International Physicians Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992, page 148

[4] Endicott, Karen. Trembling Edge of Science

[5] Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats; Mullenix PJ et al, Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1995 Mar-Apr;17(2):169-77.

[6] At mean levels of chicken consumption (60 g/person/day), people may ingest 1.38-5.24 micrograms/day of inorganic arsenic from chicken alone. At the 99th percentile of chicken consumption (350 g chicken/day), people may ingest 21.13-30.59 micrograms inorganic arsenic/day and 32.50-47.07 micrograms total arsenic/day from chicken.

[7] EPA Journal – May 1985. Lewis, Jack.

# # #

Learn how to treat yourself and your loved ones safely at home with our best-seller bundle!

Learn Dr Sircus protocol including dosages, methods, side effects and contra-indications. This bundle includes the special edition of Transdermal Magnesium Therapy, Treatment Essentials and Sodium Bicarbonate eBooks.

get yours

Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P)

Director International Medical Veritas Association
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine

Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get a free ebook!

Introduction to Natural Allopathic Medicine eBook Cover


For questions pertaining to your own personal health issues or for specific dosing of Dr. Sircus's protocol items please seek a consultation or visit our knowledge base to see if your question may have been answered previously.
  • John Fryer

    Hi Excellent article and a reminder about who Paracelsus was.

    It seems highly improbable that this tenet of the dose makes the poison should hold true for 500 years and a tribute to this man and his work.

    But it is generally understood that he was referring to non-toxic substances and the fact that even these eventually become toxic.

    We know today that for genuine toxic materials exposure alone provides risk of illness or death. Of course for th emost part we have a long developed immune system to protect us but as your example shows one persons exposure and no effect from a known poison does not mean everyone gets away without effects.

    This idea holds with LD 100 where all die,then LD50 where 50 per cent die down to LD1 where 1 per cent die.

    For extreme toxins although not recognised this idea could go down to 1 death in a thousand and so on.

    And for poisons that are reproducing we have the idea that just 3 cells of the most toxic E Coli are almost always lethal. And this reacting with the 10 trillion cells that make us adult humands.

    E Coli toxic forms number now into the hundreds but in pre-GMO days they numbered ZERO but that is another story involving Paul Berg Nobel Prize Winner and Robert Pollack who should have got the prize in his place.

    These toxic forms are now killing 700 000 children every year and the illness and death has not yet peaked.

    Unless action is taken this could become unstoppable.

    To be blunt we need to forget Paracelsus and we need his talent aopplied to the problems of today with the 300 known TOXINS found in a baby on the day of his or her birth.

    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity is one idea but not yet explained well to the masses as is that well known but outdated tenet of Paracelsus.

  • Tomas

    Thanks for this article. Most people and physicians do not realize how toxic things can be in tiny doses.

    And remember that Homeopathy demonstrates that even substances which “were” physically present can leave water energetically contaminated. There need not be any molecules of the original substance present for a physical effect to occur. So water which has been chemically “purified” will carry energetic components of the original toxins as well as the chemicals used for “treatment”.