Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get 5 chapters for free!

Hydrogen Medicine eBook Cover

The EPA Would Never Approve A Pesticide Unless It Was Safe, Right?

Published on August 30, 2024

Wrong, they would, and they have many times. The same goes for the FDA and CDC; they care not whether vaccines are safe. It is incredible but true that we live in a world where the major protection organizations are designed to attack and hurt men, women, and children everywhere. You either get this truth and let it hit you in the gut or live in a fantasy world until you get hit with a significant disease caused by a pesticide or vaccine or one of some other medical products and procedures.

Despite the safety claims by Bayer and the EPA, hundreds of studies by independent scientists link glyphosate herbicides to serious health harms, including cancer.

Even though Bayer maintains that its glyphosate products are safe and not carcinogenic, the company has thus far agreed to pay out more than $10 billion in settlement costs to tens of thousands of glyphosate users suffering from non-Hodgkin lymphoma and thousands of lawsuits remain.

Monsanto — and now Bayer — have tried to undermine independent
scientific research by attacking any findings of glyphosate’s harm.

So desperate is Bayer that the biotech giant has lobbied Congress over the past year to advance legislation that could shield the company from billions of dollars in more lawsuits, part of a national campaign to defeat claims that its weed killer Roundup causes cancer in people who use it frequently. And too many of your friendly congressmen and Senator’s support Bayers’s efforts.

Almost 40 years ago, EPA scientists conducting initial assessments of glyphosate discovered several mice dosed with the pesticide developed rare kidney tumors, prompting the scientists to confirm the pesticide’s link to cancer.

Then, the EPA’s pesticides office did what it often does: It ignored the troubling research and the recommendations of its scientists and approved pesticides without acknowledging their documented link to cancer. So, a good question is, why does the EPA exist?

Glyphosate currently has the highest global production volume of all herbicides. The most extensive use worldwide is in agriculture. The agricultural use of glyphosate has increased sharply since the development of crops that have been genetically modified to make them resistant to glyphosate. Glyphosate is also used in forestry, urban, and home applications. Glyphosate has been detected in the air during spraying, in water, and food. The general population is exposed primarily through residence near sprayed areas, home use, and diet, and the level that has been observed is generally low. The World Health Organization has classified glyphosate as an agent probably carcinogenic to humans.

Wonders From the FDA

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Opill (norgestrel), an over-the-counter (OTC) daily oral contraceptive, in July 2023. Opill is the first oral contraceptive available without a prescription in the U.S. Opill contains the hormone norgestrel, which is a type of progestin, the synthetic version of progesterone. Progestin carries significant health risks, including an increased risk of breast cancer.

Conclusion

The word poison was first recorded in Middle English in a work composed around the year 1200. A poison is any substance that destroys life or injures health when introduced into or absorbed by a living organism. Poison is defined as any substance capable of producing a morbid, harmful, or deadly effect. A poison is a material that inhibits other substances, especially enzymes, and the vital biochemical processes they are involved in. Enzymes are crucial because every chemical change that takes place to repair tissue or assimilate food involves enzyme activity. Without enzyme activity, there is no biological activity and no life.

Why was poisoning such a popular way of offing one’s adversaries? Because the implementation could be easy, and the action was often difficult to detect – a subtly poisoned drink was generally much more complicated to trace to its source than a crossbow bolt in the back. Nothing has changed in modern times, with the implementation being even more manageable and the action, until most recently, equally difficult to detect and trace back to the source. Most poisoning today is not seen as deliberate or done on purpose. Often, it is done with the best intentions of curing someone of disease.

The toxic effects of chemical agents are often not well understood or appreciated by doctors and even less so by the public. Medicine has struggled to understand the toxicities of individual chemicals yet is feeble when it comes to understanding the impacts of exposure to mixtures of chemicals and drugs doctors prescribe.

Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P)

Professor of Natural Oncology, Da Vinci Institute of Holistic Medicine
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine
Founder of Natural Allopathic Medicine

Oncology Banner

Never miss Dr. Sircus updates. Join 90,000 others in my newsletter and get a free ebook!

Get Updates

Join 60,000 others
in my newsletter and
get 5 chapters for free!

Hydrogen Medicine eBook Cover

comments

For questions pertaining to your own personal health issues or for specific dosing of Dr. Sircus's protocol items please seek a consultation or visit our knowledge base to see if your question may have been answered previously.