More than 350 Greenlandic Indigenous women and girls, including some aged 12 and younger, previously came forward to investigators and reported that Danish health authorities forcibly gave them contraception. Denmark says more than 4,000 women and girls — reportedly half the fertile women in Greenland at the time — received IUDs between the 1960s and mid-1970s.
The “no genocide” report is a masterclass in bureaucratic self-exoneration dressed up as social science. Its logic runs like this: we can’t find a signed memo that says ‘let’s destroy the Greenlandic people,’ therefore no genocide occurred. That’s not methodology — that’s a shield. (Be it known this essay is a prelude to MEDICAL INSANITY: The Disease Doctors Don’t Know They Have, which I will publish tomorrow. Also know my wife made me tone down the title of this essay)
Here’s what happened, by Denmark’s own admission: more than 4,000 Indigenous women and girls — half the fertile female population of Greenland — had IUDs shoved into their bodies or were injected with hormonal birth control without consent, without explanation, some as young as twelve. The stated goal was population control. When you target an ethnic group’s reproductive capacity, when you sterilize their children in secret, when you do it systematically across decades under the authority of the state, you don’t need a mustache-twirling villain’s diary entry to establish intent. The intent is written in the bodies of the victims.
And now the apology, the payout—300,000 kroner, about $46,500 per victim. That’s the price tag Denmark put on a stolen future. That’s what a lifetime of wondering why you couldn’t have children costs, in Danish accounting. The women who came forward are in their sixties and seventies now. Some of them carried this in silence for fifty years.
The whole thing is a reminder that the most dangerous people in the world aren’t always soldiers or dictators. Sometimes they’re smiling health officials with clipboards, the ones who call it “family planning” while committing what any honest observer would recognize as a crime against a people. The white coat doesn’t sanitize the act. It just makes it harder to prosecute.
Canadian Health Monsters

Canada pursued its own long campaign to break Indigenous peoples as distinct cultures. Beginning in the nineteenth century, the federal government forcibly removed at least 150,000 First Nations, Inuit and Métis children from their families and placed them in church-run residential schools, where their languages, names, spiritual traditions and family bonds were systematically attacked. Children endured hunger, forced labor, medical neglect, physical and sexual abuse, and many died without ever returning home. The last federally operated school did not close until 1996. Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission called the system what it was: cultural genocide—a state-sponsored attempt to destroy Indigenous identity by taking possession of the children.
The assault continued through healthcare and child welfare. Indigenous patients were confined in segregated “Indian hospitals,” sometimes used in medical and nutritional experiments without meaningful consent. Indigenous women have testified to forced or coerced sterilization, including being pressured during labor, while provincial eugenics programs disproportionately sterilized Indigenous women.
Greenland and Canada are not isolated historical accidents. Across continents and political systems, health officials have repeatedly used the language of medicine, science, and public welfare to conceal sterilization, experimentation, racial control, and death. The pattern is remarkably consistent: identify a population with little political power, redefine its members as medical or social problems, remove meaningful consent, inflict the policy through clinics and institutions, suppress complaints, and finally describe the victims’ testimony as anecdotal or scientifically inconclusive. Years later comes the carefully worded apology—usually after the responsible officials have retired, died, or escaped prosecution.
Tuskegee: Watching Black Men Die
From 1932 until 1972, the United States Public Health Service observed hundreds of Black men with syphilis in Alabama without obtaining informed consent and without offering effective treatment—even after penicillin became standard therapy. Officials misled the men, studied the progression of their disease, and protected the experiment for forty years. Wives were exposed, children were born with congenital syphilis, and men suffered and died while government physicians collected data. This was not one rogue doctor operating in a basement. It was an official federal study preserved by educated professionals who had endless opportunities to stop it and chose not to. CDC
Guatemala: Deliberately Infecting the Powerless
Between 1946 and 1948, American public-health researchers, working with Guatemalan authorities, deliberately exposed prisoners, soldiers, and psychiatric patients to bacteria that cause syphilis, gonorrhea, and chancroid. Some subjects were infected through sexual contact arranged by researchers; others were directly inoculated. The victims were selected precisely because institutionalized and impoverished people could not meaningfully resist. The project involved the U.S. Public Health Service, Guatemalan ministries, and funding from the National Institutes of Health. “Research” became the respectable name for using powerless human beings as laboratory material. CDC investigation
Puerto Rico: Women Used to Perfect the Pill
Puerto Rican women were subjected to aggressive population-control campaigns, extraordinarily high rates of sterilization and early contraceptive trials in which the experimental nature and risks were not adequately communicated. Poor women became convenient research subjects for high-dose birth-control pills developed for markets elsewhere. By the mid-twentieth century, sterilization had become widespread on the island under intense institutional promotion. Once again, the targets were women whose poverty, colonial status, and limited political power made genuine informed consent easier to ignore.
The United States: Sterilization Under the Banner of Public Health
American eugenics laws authorized the compulsory sterilization of tens of thousands of people described as “feebleminded,” disabled, immoral, criminal, or socially unfit. Black, Indigenous, Latina, poor, and institutionalized women were disproportionately vulnerable. Native American women treated through federally supported health services reported sterilizations performed without adequate consent during the twentieth century. Medical forms and signatures gave these violations a bureaucratic appearance, but paperwork obtained through pressure, deception, or incomprehensible explanations is not consent.
Peru: Population Targets Disguised as Family Planning
During Alberto Fujimori’s government in the 1990s, Peru conducted a mass sterilization campaign affecting more than 300,000 women, most of them poor, rural, and Indigenous. Health workers were pressured to meet numerical targets. Women reported threats, deception, inadequate consent, and operations performed under unsafe conditions. The program was presented as reproductive health and poverty reduction; in practice, Indigenous women’s fertility became an administrative problem to be eliminated. In 2024, a United Nations committee concluded that the policy violated women’s rights and that Peru had failed to provide adequate justice. UN Human Rights Office
Australia: Removing the Children
Australian governments forcibly removed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families under assimilation policies, creating what became known as the Stolen Generations. Children were placed in institutions, missions or white families, where language, identity and kinship were often suppressed. The consequences—family rupture, cultural loss, psychological trauma and poorer health—continue across generations. More than 27,000 Indigenous Australians aged fifty and older were estimated to be surviving members of the Stolen Generations in 2018–2019. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Britain’s Infected-Blood Scandal
From the 1970s through the early 1990s, thousands of patients in Britain received blood or blood products contaminated with HIV or hepatitis viruses. The subsequent public inquiry found not merely tragic mistakes but systemic failures, delayed warnings, withheld information, missing or destroyed records, and institutional efforts to protect reputations. The British prime minister ultimately described it as a decades-long moral failure and apologized for the refusal to confront—and attempts to conceal—what had happened. UK government statement

COVID-19: The Global Health Establishment’s Greatest Performance
Everything the establishment had been doing to vulnerable populations in isolated pockets for a century—the experimentation without consent, the suppression of dissent, the career advancement at the expense of the powerless—was scaled up and deployed against the entire human population in real time.
In March 2020, health officials across the Western world demanded—and got—the largest restriction of human freedom in modern history. They told you it was “15 days to slow the spread.” Then 30. Then indefinitely. They told you lockdowns would save millions. What they didn’t tell you was that no randomized controlled trial had ever demonstrated lockdowns work against respiratory viruses.
The modeling that drove policy—the Imperial College paper predicting 2.2 million U.S. deaths—was built on code so spaghetti-like and assumptions so aggressive that it would’ve been laughed out of any honest peer review. Neil Ferguson, the man behind it, had previously been off by a factor of 10.
The officials knew. Fauci initially said masks weren’t necessary for the public, then flipped. They said asymptomatic spread was rare, then changed their mind. They said the lab-leak theory was a conspiracy theory, then—years later—admitted it warranted investigation. They presented every reversal as “the science changing,” never as “we were wrong and lied about it.” The science didn’t change. The political utility of each position changed.
Meanwhile, suicides spiked. Cancer screenings collapsed. Domestic violence surged. Kids lost two years of education—people with low incomes and minorities worst of all. The WHO itself estimated excess deaths from disrupted healthcare rivaled COVID deaths. Health officials called these “acceptable trade-offs” without ever asking the people being traded.
The Injection Mandate Regime
Never in modern history had healthy people been coerced into a medical procedure under threat of livelihood. Health officials called them “vaccines,” but they functioned as novel gene-therapy delivery platforms using lipid nanoparticles to deliver synthetic mRNA—technology never before deployed at population scale. The Phase 3 trials weren’t completed when the shots rolled out. They measured symptomatic infection reduction, not transmission, not hospitalization, not death. “Safe and effective” became a mantra, not a conclusion.
When adverse events surfaced—myocarditis in young men, clotting disorders, neurological complications—the response was gaslighting. VAERS reports were dismissed as unverified. The CDC’s own V-safe data showing high rates of people missing work or seeking medical care after doses was buried. Pfizer’s own documents, released only after a FOIA lawsuit, revealed the company had listed over 1,200 adverse events of special concern before rollout. None of this made the press briefings.
Then came the mandates. Healthcare workers. Teachers. Military. Federal employees. Truck drivers crossing borders. Firefighters. You could serve 20 years and be shown the door for refusing an injection your own immune system and prior infection had already rendered redundant. Natural immunity—the most robust kind—was treated as though it didn’t exist. The CDC refused to study it properly for over a year. When Israeli data showed natural immunity was superior to vaccination, the finding was memory-holed.
The establishment’s own documents now tell the story. Pfizer’s 6-month safety data showed more deaths in the vaccinated group than placebo. The CDC’s website, as of 2026, acknowledges that the claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not evidence-based. The entire edifice of “safe and effective” was built on suppressed data, accelerated timelines, and the public’s trust—trust the same institutions had been burning for a century.
The Scorecard
Millions dead. Trillions spent. Small businesses destroyed while Amazon and Walmart posted record profits. Children masked and isolated while the officials imposing those rules attended unmasked dinner parties and hair salon appointments. Fauci became a folk hero and a multimillionaire. Pfizer booked over $100 billion in revenue. The NIH and CDC demanded—and mostly received—even larger budgets.
The people who ran this show haven’t been held accountable. They’ve been promoted. They give TED Talks. They write memoirs. They collect awards. The same people who told you lockdowns were science, masks were science, mandates were science, and dissent was misinformation are still in charge of the institutions that ruined your life and killed your relatives. They haven’t apologized. They haven’t been sued. They haven’t lost their jobs. They’ve just moved on to the next emergency, expecting you to trust them again.
Trust in health authorities is irrational. The health establishment has a credibility problem that isn’t fixable. The rot is structural. The same people who lecture you about “misinformation” and “trusting the science” are the scum of the earth and should not be trusted as far as you can spit into a hurricane wind.
Conclusion
The COVID era didn’t corrupt health officials—it revealed them, the way a rotting corpse reveals the maggots that were always inside. What kind of creature looks at a terrified population, tells them to hand over their livelihoods, their children’s minds, their elderly parents’ final embraces, and then injects them with an experimental product while banning every cheap alternative? The same kind that infected Guatemalan orphans with syphilis and called it science. The same kind that sterilized Indigenous women and called it public health.
The same kind that starved residential school children and called it nutrition research. The continuity is absolute: from Tuskegee to the WHO, from Indian hospitals to the CDC, from Cutler’s abraded cervixes to Fauci’s “devastating takedown” of dissenting colleagues—the same institutional soul, the same bottomless contempt for human beings who exist only as data points and revenue streams.
They wear lab coats now instead of colonial administrator uniforms. Still, the project hasn’t changed: control the bodies, silence the critics, extract the profit, bury the evidence, and demand gratitude for the privilege. The filth isn’t a bug in the system. The filth is the system. And it has never been more naked than when the whole world was forced to look at it and still—still—too many people chose to applaud.
And we did not even mention Nazi health officials and doctors. But tomorrow we will put the sanity of health and medical officials under a microscope, and I promise you they will not look very sane or trustworthy.
Dr.Sircus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscribe now

comments