The Central Intelligence Agency has shifted its stance on the origin of COVID-19, saying that the virus was “more likely” leaked from a Chinese lab than transmitted by animals. British intelligence agrees. The Chinese say no, and health officials in America, with the help of the media, have confused the issue since the beginning.
The new CIA director, John Ratcliffe, said, “The agency is going to get off the sidelines about COVID-19 being leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Recently pardoned Dr. Fauci would be cast into outer space if it were clear that his cherished gain-of-function research was held responsible for the death of millions.
New Zealand is now facing the stomach-churning reality of a public
health crisis after the government’s mass vaccination campaign led
to the population being almost universally “vaccinated” for Covid.
Adverse events like heart failure (myocarditis and pericarditis) surged.
American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough raised the alarm over his recent peer-reviewed study showing surging excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths among people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.” The study found a bone-chilling 1,236% surge in excess deaths caused by heart failure and sudden cardiac arrests among the COVID-vaccinated population. Other highly professional vaccine experts are warning that almost everyone who received the injections had some heart damage that is only going to get worse over time.
USAID Funded Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for International Distribution. USAID awarded up to 6.9 billion US Dollars to Pfizer for “COVID-19 VACCINES FOR INTERNATIONAL DONATION.” In 2021, the Daily Mail reported that USAID funded Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance to the tune of $64.7 million. This means that USAID is responsible for many deaths from the COVID-19 bioweapon in infection and vaccine form.
A former USAID director, John Gilligan, admitted that USAID was “infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people.” Gilligan explained that “the idea was to plant operatives in every activity we had overseas: government, volunteer, religious, every kind.”
The unprecedentedly speedy development and approval of the various COVID-19 “vaccines” is considered a scientific miracle by ardent vaccination followers. However, many see it as one of the greatest scams ever perpetrated against a frightened public and a potentially dangerous one. But the damage doesn’t end with Covid. These so-called breakthroughs have paved the way for a massive expansion of mRNA-based medicine, most notably, in the form of so-called “cancer vaccines.”
We can estimate that Pfizer raised your all-cause mortality by at least
14.3% and Moderna raised it by at least 20% on average for at
least a year or more. In short, the cure was far deadlier than the disease.
Steve Kirsch
Wired recently published an interview with Dr. Lennard Lee, oncologist and director at the Ellison Institute of Technology, under the headline: “Covid Vaccines Have Paved the Way for Cancer Vaccines.” However, these are not vaccines. Dr. Lee himself admits that these experimental products don’t prevent cancer but rather are designed to treat it after diagnosis. That makes them therapeutic interventions, not vaccines—a distinction lost in the post-COVID world where the very definition of the word “vaccine” has been quietly reprogrammed.
More disturbing still is the timeline. These mRNA cancer shots are barely three years old, yet are already barreling toward market approval in less than five. What used to take 10–20 years of cautious development, rigorous safety testing, and long-term outcome studies is now being compressed into mere months under the guise of “modernizing the process.”
The cancer industry is already worth over $400 billion a year, and it’s only growing. And with the “pandemic” fading, Big Pharma needed a new faucet. Cancer—emotionally charged, profit-rich, and easily exploited—was the perfect target.
Let’s be clear: this is not about curing cancer. It’s about extending a failed vaccine model into a new and even more lucrative market where rushed approvals, limited liability, and public fear create the perfect storm for exploitation.
The Alchemical Lie: Vaccines That Aren’t
By calling these therapeutic products “vaccines,” corporations inherit all the regulatory shortcuts and public goodwill associated with childhood immunizations—without delivering immunity, prevention, or clarity.
This is not just scientific sleight of hand. It’s linguistic warfare. It’s the reprogramming of reality.
Words matter. Definitions matter. Time-tested scientific processes matter. When you erase those boundaries in the name of speed, what you get is not innovation. You get human medical experimentation at scale.
Language is being abused.
More tactfully, we could say:
“Calling mRNA cancer treatments ‘vaccines’ is like calling assault
‘intimacy.’ It’s not a medical innovation. It’s a linguistic violation.”
Bicarbonate Therapy: The People’s Chemotherapy
Now, contrast this with one of the most straightforward, most affordable, and non-toxic therapies ever proposed for treating cancer: bicarbonate therapy.
Sodium bicarbonate—baking soda—is not a billion-dollar biotech product. It doesn’t require digital tools, data modeling, or government procurement deals. It simply works by doing what cancer hates: restoring alkaline balance in the body and enhancing oxygen and carbon dioxide metabolism at the cellular level.
Cancer thrives in acidic, low-oxygen environments. Bicarbonate alkalizes the tissue, improves cellular oxygenation, and disrupts the terrain in which tumors flourish. Moreover, bicarbonate acts synergistically with carbon dioxide (CO₂), creating a physiological condition that:
- Increases oxygen delivery to tissues by supporting the Bohr effect.
- Expands blood vessels, improving circulation to tumor-restricted zones.
- Reduces inflammation through alkalizing effects.
- Normalizes cellular respiration, reversing anaerobic fermentation common in cancer cells.
- Buffers lactic acid and neutralizes acidity in the tumor microenvironment.
- Improves mitochondrial function, key to restoring healthy cell metabolism.
- Supports immune function by optimizing pH and tissue oxygen.
- Counters the hypoxic, acidic signature of aggressive tumor growth.
- Enhances detoxification, facilitating the removal of toxic metabolic byproducts.
- Increases CO₂ tolerance, strengthening the body’s ability to manage internal stressors.
It can be taken orally, intravenously, or combined with sugars like molasses to selectively target cancer cells’ metabolic cravings.
The major thing bicarbonate does is neutralize the lactic acid surrounding cancer tumors. Acidic fluids and tissues incapacitate killer T-cells, making them lazy and ineffective. But when the acid surrounding tumors is neutralized, it calls up the Marines of the immune system—the killer T-cells—who are then able to penetrate and destroy the enemy, as good Marines do. Its cost is negligible. Its safety record is solid. And unlike mRNA therapies, its mechanisms are understandable, transparent, and biologically sound.
Bicarbonate therapy represents everything the pharmaceutical industry fears:
- A decentralized, do-it-yourself treatment model
- A non-toxic alternative to the cut/poison/burn regime
- A threat to a trillion-dollar business model built on endless suffering
If mRNA cancer therapies are about profit and patents, bicarbonate therapy is about biology and balance. And yet, which one gets media coverage? Which one gets billions in funding? Which one gets censored?
Chlorine Dioxide and Cancer
On March 21st, our partner clinic in Germany reported another major success story using our Intertumoral Chlorine Dioxide Injection Therapy. On March 14th, the clinic received a patient with advanced breast cancer. The tumor was large (over 10 cm in diameter) and externally exposed, with additional tumor masses in the lymphatic regions. The medical team injected a total of 20,000 ppm chlorine dioxide directly into all visible tumor sites.
After returning home, the patient reported feeling no pain at all during the injection, and more interestingly, her heart rate dropped from 100 to 80 bpm. I believe this heart rate improvement reflects the rapid tumor necrosis and pressure relief on nearby cardiovascular structures. The chlorine dioxide began working immediately.
Because the main breast tumor was externally visible, both the physician and the patient were able to visually observe the therapeutic effect in real time. Seven days later, on March 21st, the patient returned to the clinic for the second injection. Since the tumor remained exposed to air, I advised increasing the dose to avoid potential infection from necrotic tissue. This time, the clinic administered a total of 60 ml, with 40 ml injected into the main breast tumor.
Dr.Sircus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
comments