Part Two – The Law Begins to Hammer On Vaccinationists

After years of dedicated work, American Front Line Doctors succeeded in provoking the Ninth Circuit Court to expose the TRUTH in a groundbreaking decision that will have profound legal ramifications for COVID-19 shots and beyond. Hopefully, it will crush Pfizer and Moderna along with the FDA and CDC branches of government. That would be just the beginning.

The Ninth Circuit ruled that COVID-19 shots cannot be classified as vaccines because they do not stop the spread of the disease. This means it was entirely illegal for the U.S. Government and its various tyrannical health agencies to force anyone to take these shots.

Dr. Simone Gold, founder and president of American Frontline Doctors, said, “In October 2021, America’s Frontline Doctors and I sued Kaiser on behalf of 4,000 employees based on this argument. I clearly saw that these were experimental therapeutics that did not stop transmission – they were not vaccines as the word had been historically defined, and therefore, our government had no legal standing to mandate them. We were the first to present this legal theory, and this pivotal ruling is a direct result of our work.”

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision affirms my work and the work of America’s Frontline Doctors! Liability protection under U.S. law is granted only to valid vaccines. The CDC and pharmaceutical companies were fully aware of this critical distinction when they changed the definition of “vaccine” in 2021 to include mRNA shots. This pivotal decision also reveals the lack of integrity of the CDC’s actions and holds Big Pharma accountable for its attempt to manipulate legal protections,” Dr. Gold continued.

“The U.S. Government and its corrupt health agencies mislead the public by altering definitions and pushing mandates that do not meet legal or health standards. This ruling challenges government overreach and represents a HUGE VICTORY for medical freedom. Ultimately, this decision challenges Big Pharma’s unlimited liability protection and may hold them responsible for producing dangerous COVID-19 treatments. I believe this ruling may fundamentally reshape national vaccine policies and prevent future unconstitutional mandates. Further, this opens the door for those who lost their jobs and livelihoods for refusing the injections to seek restitution.”

Conclusion

One can always hope that truth and justice will eventually be served. As we saw in part one of this series, evidence is piling up. Many people around the world understand what is happening and are doing their best to reverse the vaccine madness that has taken over the world.