Join 90,000 others
in my newsletter and
get 5 chapters for free!

Hydrogen Medicine eBook Cover

Snowing in June Due to Global Warming?

Published on June 12, 2024

In the mainstream news, we read that last year was the hottest ever. So, it makes no sense that it is still snowing in June in certain spots and crop-damaging frosts in other areas, as summer is upon us. The Conversation site writes, ‘An intergenerational crime against humanity’: what will it take for political leaders to start taking climate change seriously?

Maybe they need to stop looking at all the record cold and snow weather reports from around the world, crop losses due to freezing, and shortened growing seasons, and completely tune out the long list of scientists who disagree with the mainstream narrative that CO2 is the cause of global warming. (See these scientists at the end of this essay.)

Global warming is probably the greatest con in human history. Even the United States government (NOAA) predicts a grand solar minimum as sunspots drop to almost zero at the end of this decade. That means increasing cold. Teeth will chatter, bones will be brittle from the cold, and many will be poorer at the expense of keeping warm. Yet, I kid you not. They are saying we are on the highway to ‘catastrophic climate hell.’ I guess some people think the sun could disappear and that our increased CO2 levels will continue to keep us warm. You will NEVER hear from the global warming crowd that the sun has anything to do with the climate on Earth.

Photosynthesis (CO2 + Sunlight + H2O) cannot exist without
carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis uses sunlight to transform carbon
dioxide into glucose and other organic compounds that make
plants, and it transforms water into oxygen, which is exuded.

The most recent headlines are ‘Feet Of June Snow Traps Hikers In German Alps.’ Over the first weekend in June, after an out-of-season snowstorm blew in, a rescue operation was launched to evacuate dozens of stranded hikers on Germany’s highest mountain, the Zugspitze. Snow has hit the highlands of Scotland, a rare event for June, with temperatures plummeting to unseasonably low single figures (C). Also, during the first week of June, at least nine Indian trekkers died in the Himalayas after getting trapped during a blizzard. Heavy snow also hit northeast Iceland in the second week of June.

We also read that unseasonable cold is also infecting much of North America this week, with snow on the cards for the likes of Montana. Frost advisories are in place across central Lower Michigan, away from the lakeshore. Temperatures are also dipping to near-freezing across northern Wisconsin and into the UP of Michigan.

GFS 2m Temperature Anomalies for June 12 image
GFS 2m Temperature Anomalies for June 12 [tropicaltidbits.com].
Blue in the above image stands for colder than normal.

England, for example, is on for a frigid month, ranking among the top 15 coldest Junes in books dating back 365 years to 1659 (currently on par with June 1907). Reports from all over the world are complaining about cooler-than-normal weather, yet the mainstream insists that every month is hotter than normal, the hottest ever.

Russia Hasn’t Suffered Frost this Late in the Year for more than a Century.

Russia’s grain harvest is expected to be pegged back to 129 million metric tons in 2024 due to the freezing temperatures recorded in the country earlier this month, the head of the Russian Grain Union (RGU), Arkady Zlochevsky, has said.

According to the grain union, Russia hasn’t suffered frosts this late in the year for more than a century, stressing again that the optimal time for resowing has already been missed: “Even if it is possible to replant all the areas required for replanting with spring sown cereal, the harvest will still be significantly lower than autumn sown cereal could provide.”

Rare Frost Advisories In Ontario

Environment Canada has issued frost advisories for much of Ontario. The weather agency said the frost could damage fruit trees and vegetable plants. The Kent Federation of Agriculture (KFA) said transplanted vegetable crops like tomatoes are a big concern. New KFA President Bard Snobelen noted if they get hit with frost, they will likely have to be replanted, which is costly and time-consuming. “The longer it stays cold, the more damage will be done,” said Snobelen.

Meteorologist Peter Kimbell said it is strange to have frost so late in the spring, and he warns that many low-temperature records are at risk of falling across the province, particularly on the morning of May 31, including a handful set back in the late 1800s. Speaking to similar past events, Kimbell said: “We had cool temperatures at the end of May 2021 and 1897.”

More Signs of Global Warming?

Since the start of June, Greenland has received more than 50 billion tons of snow, adding significant mass to the ice sheet. Data from the Danish Meteorological Institute (via Polar Portal) shows this month’s significant, record-challenging gains. The Snow Mass Balance (SMB) chart (below) reveals daily gains nearing six gigatons, contrasting the typical summer melt, which typically commences after mid-May. The recent accumulations far exceed the long-term average (1981-2010).

Nick Giambruno writes, “In the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church convinced the commoners to buy indulgences to alleviate their sins. And they made a fortune in the process. Similarly, today, our overlords—the mainstream media, central bankers, and their political allies—are working overtime to convince the commoners to pay for their alleged climate sins. Enter carbon credits, which are government-issued permits that grant you the privilege to emit a certain amount of carbon dioxide. Although advocates promote them as a way to “save the environment,” in reality, carbon credits are nothing more than a devious mechanism to tax, regulate, and control you.”

Strange Weather

As severe weather continued Thursday through the Great Plains, residents of a southwest Texas town reported a dramatic temperature drop on Wednesday and hail so deep they had to deploy snow plows to clear the streets.

The temperature in Marathon, Texas, fell more than 50 degrees on Wednesday afternoon as thermometers tumbled from around 105 degrees to the mid-50s in about an hour, Brian Curran, a meteorologist for the National Weather Service Midland, Texas, told ABC News.

Below is an enlightening list of comments made by former IPCC contributors after cutting ties with the politicized body, i.e., scientists no longer at risk of professional repercussions.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

Dr Mike Hulme: “Claims such as ‘2500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous … The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was only a few dozen.”

Dr Kiminori Itoh: “There are many factors which cause climate change. Considering only greenhouse gases is nonsense and harmful.”

Dr Yuri Izrael: “There is no proven link between human activity and global warming. I think the panic over global warming is totally unjustified. There is no serious threat to the climate.”

Dr Steven Japar: “Temperature measurements show that the climate model-predicted mid-troposphere hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them.”

Dr Georg Kaser: “This number [of receding glaciers reported by the IPCC] is not just a little bit wrong, it is far out by any order of magnitude … It is so wrong that it is not even worth discussing.”

Dr Aynsley Kellow: “I’m not holding my breath for criticism to be taken on board, which underscores a fault in the whole peer review process for the IPCC: there is no chance of a chapter [of the IPCC report] ever being rejected for publication, no matter how flawed it might be.”

Dr Madhav Khandekar: “I have carefully analysed adverse impacts of climate change as projected by the IPCC and have discounted these claims as exaggerated and lacking any supporting evidence.”

Dr Hans Labohm: “The alarmist passages in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers have been skewed through an elaborate and sophisticated process of spin-doctoring.”

Dr Andrew Lacis: “There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department.”

Dr Chris Landsea: “I cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”

Dr Richard Lindzen: “The IPCC process is driven by politics rather than science. It uses summaries to misrepresent what scientists say and exploits public ignorance.”

Dr Harry Lins: “Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. The case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated.”

Dr Philip Lloyd: “I am doing a detailed assessment of the IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science. I have found examples of a summary saying precisely the opposite of what the scientists said.”

Dr Martin Manning: “Some government delegates influencing the IPCC Summary for Policymakers misrepresent or contradict the lead authors.”

Steven McIntyre: “The many references in the popular media to a ‘consensus of thousands of scientists’ are both a great exaggeration and also misleading.”

Dr Patrick Michaels: “The rates of warming, on multiple time scales, have now invalidated the suite of IPCC climate models. No, the science is not settled.”

Dr Nils-Axel Morner: “If you go around the globe, you find no sea level rise anywhere.”

Dr Johannes Oerlemans: “The IPCC has become too political. Many scientists have not been able to resist the siren call of fame, research funding and meetings in exotic places that awaits them if they are willing to compromise scientific principles and integrity in support of the man-made global-warming doctrine.”

Dr Roger Pielke: “All of my comments were ignored without even a rebuttal. At that point, I concluded that the IPCC Reports were actually intended to be advocacy documents designed to produce particular policy actions, but not a true and honest assessment of the understanding of the climate system.”

Dr Paul Reiter: “As far as the science being ‘settled,’ I think that is an obscenity. The fact is the science is being distorted by people who are not scientists.”

Dr Murry Salby: “I have an involuntary gag reflex whenever someone says the science is settled. Anyone who thinks the science is settled on this topic is in fantasia.”

Dr Tom Segalstad: “The IPCC global warming model is not supported by the scientific data.”

Dr Fred Singer: “Isn’t it remarkable that the Policymakers Summary of the IPCC report avoids mentioning the satellite data altogether, or even the existence of satellites — probably because the data show a slight cooling over the last 18 years, in direct contradiction of the calculations from climate models?”

Dr Hajo Smit: “There is clear cut solar-climate coupling and a very strong natural variability of climate on all historical time scales. Currently I hardly believe anymore that there is any relevant relationship between human CO2 emissions and climate change.”

Dr Richard Tol: “The IPCC attracted more people with political rather than academic motives. In AR4, green activists held key positions in the IPCC and they succeeded in excluding or neutralizing opposite voices.”

Dr Tom Tripp: “There is so much of a natural variability in weather it makes it difficult to come to a scientifically valid conclusion that global warming is man made.”

Dr Gerd-Rainer Weber: “Most of the extremist views about climate change have little or no scientific basis.”

Dr David Wojick: “The public is not well served by this constant drumbeat of alarms fed by computer models manipulated by advocates.”

Dr Miklos Zagoni: “I am positively convinced that the anthropogenic global warming theory is wrong.”

Dr Eduardo Zorita: “Editors, reviewers and authors of alternative studies, analysis, interpretations, even based on the same data we have at our disposal, have been bullied and subtly blackmailed.”

Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P)

Professor of Natural Oncology, Da Vinci Institute of Holistic Medicine
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine
Founder of Natural Allopathic Medicine

Oncology Banner

Never miss Dr. Sircus updates. Join 90,000 others in my newsletter and get a free ebook!

Get Updates

Join 90,000 others
in my newsletter and
get 5 chapters for free!

Hydrogen Medicine eBook Cover

comments

For questions pertaining to your own personal health issues or for specific dosing of Dr. Sircus's protocol items please seek a consultation or visit our knowledge base to see if your question may have been answered previously.