This essay raises serious concerns about mRNA vaccine safety, particularly regarding myocarditis, and questions the motives of key figures like Dr. Robert Malone and the broader public health establishment. It also touches on heart disease trends and the perceived contradictions in reporting.
CDC’s Captain Dr. Sarah Meyer (CDC/NCEZID), during her recent ACIP presentation titled “COVID-19 safety update” regarding long-term outcomes from COVID-19 mRNA product myocarditis, assured the nation that post mRNA vaccine myocarditis, while a real risk, resolves completely without long-term problems. Dr. Robert Malone writes, “Frankly, that statement was verifiably false.”
The claim that myocarditis “resolves completely” is controversial because even mild heart tissue damage can lead to scarring, potentially increasing risks of arrhythmias or heart failure years later. A 2024 follow-up study in Circulation noted that 10–20% of vaccine-related myocarditis cases showed lingering cardiac abnormalities at one-year follow-ups.
Myocarditis was widely denied and derided as a side effect, and reports of myocarditis were frowned upon by elite physicians and social media narrative enforcers because they were all mean-hearted, lying betrayers of human trust. Some finger what is known as subclinical myocarditis, understanding even slight damage to heart tissues leaves its chemical markers and long-term damage that will shorten a person’s lifespan. The concern about myocarditis as a side effect of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) is well-documented.
Dr. Malone asks, “Should we prosecute Pfizer (and Heart, Lung and Blood, and FDA) for the crime of not being able to rapidly enroll a seriously challenging study AND not being able to step into a time machine and come back with the outcome? I think not.” Maybe not for this, but for even promoting mRNA vaccines, they should be hanged. I do not understand Malone’s real stance.
In June 2025, under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Dr. Robert W. Malone was appointed to the CDC’s key vaccine advisory group, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). An American physician and biochemist credited with early mRNA delivery research. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he became a prominent vaccine skeptic, frequently promoting disputed claims about mRNA vaccine safety and COVID-19 treatments.
Are mRNA vaccines safe? Definitely not! It could not be any clearer, but some people cannot hear an atom bomb going off, no matter how close to ground zero they are.
Malone and others may be playing a multidimensional game, thinks my AI.
- Appearing to protect the public,
- While keeping high-tech biopharma infrastructure alive,
- And avoiding a complete reckoning with mRNA harms.
It might not be outright betrayal—it could be calculated compromise. But many are asking: Why not call for a moratorium on mRNA? Why not demand accountability for past vaccine injuries? Until those questions are answered transparently, the sense that something manipulative is underway at the CDC will only grow.
Kennedy’s team hasn’t called for a full ban on mRNA—just tighter safety reviews and informed consent. Could this be an effort to clean the image of mRNA for future “safe use,” like in cancer vaccines or next-gen flu shots?
Yet the FDA has expanded warnings about myocarditis in young men who take the two leading COVID-19 vaccines. Anyone want to doubt the dangers of mRNA vaccine shots? Myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation, emerged as a complication after the first shots became widely available in 2021. Both drugmakers already advise doctors about the issue in their prescribing information.
CNN – The Ultimate in Cardiac Stupidity
Heart disease is the leading cause of death around the world; however, CNN was stupid enough to print that overall heart disease death rates over the past five decades dropped by 66% in American adults aged 25 and older. “Deaths from heart attacks dropped by nearly 90%.
Stupid because deaths from all other types of heart disease, including arrhythmia, heart failure, and hypertensive heart disease, increased by 81% in the United States, according to the study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
The ultimate in double-speak? “These days, the likelihood of dying from a heart attack is relatively low compared to where it’s been, but the likelihood of significant disability from the heart attack is still high,” said Freeman, who was not involved in the study and not involved in making any sense. CNN’s framing of the decline as a success story is misleading.
“Over the past 50 years, our understanding of heart disease, what causes it, and how we treat it has evolved considerably,” said lead study author Dr. Sara King, a second-year internal medicine resident at Stanford University School of Medicine in California. “There have been great strides made in helping people survive initial acute cardiac events that were once considered a death sentence,” King said in a statement.
The great strides go no further than having 91 million Americans taking Statin drugs, and millions undergoing aggressive cardio interventions. No matter what they say, heart disease is still the number one cause of death, though cancer might be overtaking it as cancer deaths spike. There are better ways to deal with heart disease, which I call Natural Cardiology, which makes the below quote from Dr. Roberts real.
Deaths from atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias, which happen when electrical impulses to the heart go awry and cause an irregular heartbeat or “flutter” in the chest, were rare in the 1970s. By 2022, the number had risen to 450% — about 4% of all heart disease deaths, the study found. Deaths from heart failure increased 146% over the same period, while deaths due to persistent high blood pressure rose by 106%.
Dr.Sircus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscribe now
comments